My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application materials
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1340 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0015
>
Land Use
>
LA19-0000084, SKPLAN
>
Application
>
Application materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 1:23:25 PM
Creation date
10/14/2025 1:23:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 20, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Ressler suggested the applicant counter this plan with something to improve the situation and that they <br />might not necessarily be helping the situation by keeping the road at 12 feet wide. Ressler stated they <br />should look at balancing some of the difficulties the current residents encounter with the road by perhaps <br />adding a turnaround on the property. <br />Gustafson asked whether a turnaround on Lot 21 to allow better neighborhood and emergency vehicle <br />access and turnaround would be beneficial. <br />Thiesse commented that would be something to help the situation. The 75400t section from two <br />directions is also an issue. Thiesse stated he is not convinced that this is a buildable lot, which is another <br />big concern. <br />Lemke stated he is in agreement and that the proposal seems way too confirmed. Lemke stated in his <br />view there is a need for an emergency vehicle turnaround and that the lot does not seem buildable. <br />Gustafson asked whether emergency vehicles can make it down to the end of the road currently without a <br />turnaround. <br />Barnhart stated they can make it down to the end of the road. <br />Erickson stated in a true emergency, the fire trucks could also cut across somebody's grass. <br />Lemke stated he would also like to see a complete development plan so he can understand the full impact. <br />Barnhart asked whether the Planning Commission would like to see a conforming access in the back. <br />Thiesse stated that would be his preference. As it relates to the 75-foot setback, Thiesse noted it is a huge <br />property and that they are proposing to chop on a very narrow piece. Thiesse stated he is struggling with <br />the 75400t setback since he is not convinced it is a buildable lot. <br />Gustafson pointed out they are not chopping off one lot but are rather combining multiple properties into <br />a larger lot. <br />Ressler stated since it is not currently developed, it is a different situation, and that there will be more <br />traffic generated and the need for emergency vehicles to travel down the road will increase. <br />Gustafson stated the current access to the peninsula will not be made more difficult since that is what will <br />remain but that there will just be a house there. <br />Thiesse stated in his opinion it is a substandard road and that there is not much they can do to improve <br />that situation, but they can try to improve whatever else they can. <br />Lemke commented rather than have four unbuildable lots, they now have one unbuildable lot. <br />Thiesse asked whether the Planning Commission feels adjustments to the lot area requirements are <br />justified, including access or easements in lot area. Thiesse stated he is looking at an owner that owns a <br />bunch of property and that there is a neighboring city that requires lots be combined if they are all under <br />the same ownership. <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.