Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1981 The Planning Commission met on the above date. The following ATTENDANCE members were present: Chairman Hammerel,Goetten, McDonald, 7:30 PM Rovegno, Jabbour, and Adams. Norman Paurus was present from the City Council. Jeanne Mabusth ant. Thomas Jacobs represented the City staff. Applicant was not present. Adams was concerned about the 10 V AMES MCCLEARY year variance expiration. Staff noted that it would be reason- 3445 Bayside Rd. able to assume that in the future, if the lots werc not built on Final Subdivisior the City would likely follow the same pattern in granting the 0589 variance. Goetten asked if there were any park iedication fees. Mabusth stated that Council waived the park fees. Hammerel moved to approve the McCleary final subdivision subject to the findings and conditions setforth in the staff resolution. McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). Charles Van Eeckhout was present. Adams wanted to know how the line of the wetland was determined. Van Eeckhout stated that the actual wetland is a meandering line but a straight lire was drawn for simple description purposes. Adams questioned how wide the road was that serves the 7 lots. Van Eeckhout stated the road outlot is 50' wide with a 100' cul de sa- but that the finished road surface would be about 20'. C.E. VAN EECKHOUI 1025 North Brown Preliminary Subdivision 4626 Jabbour noted that Lot 1 lacked the necessary 200' width along the proposed road but since the average lot widths of the remaining 6 lots is adequate and slid not appear a problem especiali;, since there is some 400' of frontage alone; Brown Road. Adams moved to approve the 7 Lot plat of Charles Van Eeckhout in granting a lot width variance to Lot 1 based on the following hardships: 1 - Adequate 465' of lot side yard alone Brown Road 2 - There is adequate width 112' along building line in consideration of the 50 and 30 ft side yard setback. such approval is subject to the following finding: 1 - All lots meet the standards of the City's on site septic code and that each lot meets the lot standards of the RR-lB zoning district. and subject to the following conditions: 1 - City to take underlying road and utilities easements over Outlot A - road outlot 2 - City will require applicant to enter into a maintenance agreement to divide cost of upkeep and maintenance of said road between all seven lots.