|
Uecembe& 24, t979
<br />Soil So.tings - Stubbs Say Matina PAopctty
<br />Page 2
<br />Any d.,ain'.i.efd app,cved scA i►lstaff atic►, cn these coifs shaft be
<br />Subject .to .the mete•ting o,� xate4 i► 6kow, and ier(utai p.ivund Xate,
<br />t .Aatity testing. Cettisicates os Cor-pt ia►lce shaft be issued en a
<br />one -yea,. •tcn.t,'abte substandard system basis and mace be revoked at
<br />ano time that aicund wate_n onatittis ctt+ld to be detetietating.
<br />The Sot totciny snit eta ssi �icatien s.• zics raft with ('it this tcStIicti.•e.
<br />category:
<br />Gfeneve - Cc
<br />Ha►nef Loam - Ha
<br />Lake Feacticr - Lc, Ld
<br />Mats{t - Ma —
<br />P,,aty Muck Pa, Pm
<br />,My con6611cied opinion is that a ece tain en-.-i- i:rrentaf tisf:. as teeft as
<br />a shaft tish cj system bai£une tj,'ou£d be i►1;;c`.e+tt in a mound system
<br />on this site. The envitv►tmentat Aish, is .that tri.th the high watet tabfe
<br />some untreated yr ,'a ztiatty treated septic e ,•'fuent may e►itept ,the watcA
<br />table, and at tltis point treatment stvps. This is a pot£ution ,isle
<br />move .than a diAect heafth haza,d, as £000 as wc£ts a&c Dept deep enough.
<br />The tong term essects oil the deep. water suppfy, say 50-100 years hence,
<br />ate subject to specufativn. The wish, o6 sits -ten Jaitute is that i6 the
<br />wate•t table. is veAy high, nv.tma£ usage v�, tltc mound might cause saturation
<br />in the suAsace tacfc•i.s and possibte seepage on the suAsace, which is a
<br />potential heatth haza,d.
<br />Mound .sy.stems soh one of pessibty t.cec buildings, of a simile mound `o
<br />serve two units, might be reasibttl developed on the south side os the
<br />ptopetty with pAvpeA design and stoodpnoos.ina methods. A tibciat
<br />intetpneta.tion cs out code cvould suggest .that ;rem the observed water
<br />table and pLobabte pe,cvtatio►1 ?a.te a mound would be acceptable. Front
<br />the .insetned site conditions v� a hiu(t Ovate, table teith.in 1 to 2 sect
<br />os the suASace (4.tom soil 6u&v(,.y intetptcta.tion) a mound troutd net be
<br />acceptable. A mound coutd be desic;ned to minimizze the e►lv.ctonmentat
<br />•fish bit including a decpe.r sand far+et.
<br />One po.ssibte aftetnative soA an acceptable system might be a hotdi►la
<br />tank/giteywatet mound cc+rbinatien. The tvitet wastes and garbage ntirdL"t
<br />wastes woutd be piped to a hotdi.►lg to►lk which tecutd lave to be pumped c•it
<br />Aegufv-,ty. For a 5 membeA 4amity at 5 �lus(les pe•t person pen day at
<br />3 gattons pen stush this is 75 gaftons pen day vt 27,000 gallons pe: year.
<br />With a 2,000 gatton tank :the puml:,out cos t.s teoutd be app•toximately $806
<br />peA yea&. The u.reywateA (sinks, shower, bathtub, faundit woutd be pumped
<br />to a mound 6116tcm a►1 the 11 ,g11 pci►lt cs each tot. The use os a ctteytaatet
<br />system signisicantty dec,eases the amount t-; SOV and phv6phates and nea:ft,
<br />eliminates the ni.ttvaen cvntpott►tds (Page 71 - Manuat v6 G,cywatet T,catment
<br />P&act.icel.
<br />
|