Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPT9MUR 24, 1979 PAGE 3 The applicant proposes the construction of a 34' X 20' adeition, coneeiating of two bedrooms and a bath. The Hubers note that an existing 9' X 12' bedroom will be converted to a d, ,,.- sewir- room ai►d that thu house will have ►ree define bedrooms. The Zoning Administrator reviewed the variances required in this application: 1) variance to moratorium, 2) variance to septic code - SO' separation between well and drainfield (75' is required in Septic Ordinance) i 10' setback from property line for drainfield (20' is required in Septic Ordinance), and 3) variance for side ysird setback of 19.21. Oaffron reviewed for the Planning Commission the conflicts presented with this type of application involving building expansion on substandard lots and complying with standards of septic code. The proposed expansion on the Huber property not only increased the specification for main dra-nfield area but placed the same demands on seeking an alternate drain - field area. There was not enough dry land area left to satisfy the septic code. The Hubers have been able to acquire an additional lot. Gaffron recommends approval based on acquisition of the additional land for an alternate site. Frahm moved to recommend approval of the variance based on the septic .inspector's recommendation and that Lot 6 be combined with Lott 12 and 13 upon Council approval, proof of combination obtained before a building permit will be issued. Motion seconded by Adams. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. The applicant proposes combining lots 9, 10, 41, 12 and 13, Block 2, Minnetonka Summit Park to create a residential building site. The combined lots total 681 of required acre or a 324 lot area variance. each lot was assessed .20 of a unit, totaling a full unit assessment upon combination. After an inspection of the site, Planning Commission determined the request to be consistent with pattern of neighborhood development. Planning Commission noted site plan submitted with application did not require setback variances. Arplirnnt was advibed that if Council grants the lot area variance, no setback variances would be granted. f, VROBERT W. HUBER 3390 Bayside Road VARIANCE (IS17) MARTIN RAFFERTY 480 Linden Avesnti.: VARIANCE (1518)