My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3390 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-14-0052
>
Land Use
>
79-517, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 10:52:28 AM
Creation date
10/14/2025 10:50:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#517 <br />?Of Joanne Mabusth, toning Administrator <br />�t1 <br />PR M: Michael P. Gaffron, Septic System Inspector <br />DAM September 24, 1979 <br />SUBJECT: f517 Robert M. Huber, 3390 Sayside Road - VARIA:4cZ <br />The Huber* have indicated a willingness to acquire an additional <br />50' X 125' lot from the owner of Lots 6-11. The addition of this <br />lot (Lot 6) will give them ample room for future drainfield <br />(whether it be standard trenches or a sound system). Assuming a <br />variance to our well and septic codes to allow a 50' rather than <br />75' separation distance between septic systems and wells (state <br />required minimum), this lot acquisition will not appreciably affect <br />the future drainfield possibilities for the owner of Lots 6-11, <br />who will still have more than the required room for future drainfield <br />additions. <br />Note that: 1) There have been no cases of wrll water contamination <br />from septic systems in Orono. Allowing the state minimum of 50' <br />separation should not cause any potential problems on either of these <br />lots, 2) Our policy on enforcement of the septic code with regards <br />to potential water use additions on substandard lots has been and <br />should continue to be that the existing septic system must be in <br />good working condition and that enough area must be preserved for <br />at least one future conforming drainfield. Specifically, I <br />recommend that if the Huber addition is allowed, no action be taken <br />to make the existing septic system conforming until such time that <br />it fails, at which time it must be made fully conforming. While <br />an addition of drainfield would maze the system conforming now, <br />there is a possibility that •nf additions could disturb the existing <br />working system, and that future additions may require construction <br />of a mound system in the back yard if soil conditions dictate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.