Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 21, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1442-LANDSCHUTF. GROUP, INC. CONTINUED <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained that this matter had previously been before the <br />Planning Commission. There have been no changes to that original <br />proposal. Each of the 2 lots will have 2 acres and the <br />drainfield sites have been dedicated. Each lot -ill be served by <br />a separate driveway. Lot 2 will have a driveway off of Leaf <br />Street, Lot 2 will have an access off of Bayside. <br />Mr. Henry Furchner, 360 Leaf Street, expressed his concern <br />regardit.3 the driveway being installed off of Leaf Street due to <br />the normally wet, marshy conditions that exist in that area. <br />Ms. Sut ulsun. 3280 Bayside Road, questioned where the house <br />and driveway for the lot on Bayside Road would be located. <br />Gaffron said that the driveway had to go to the west of the <br />defined drainfield site. He said that the applicant was <br />proposing to locate the driveway next to the Olson's driveway. <br />Ms. Olson indicated that she would prefer to have the driveway <br />more centrally located. Gaffron showed Ms. Olson where the house <br />was proposed to be located. <br />Ms. Jane Behrman, 340 Le%f Street, asked where the existing <br />house on Leaf Street was loca, ­_ Gaffron indicated that there <br />were several houses on Leaf Stre:,_. Ms. Behrman asked whether <br />the proposed lots would be sewered? Gaffron said that the <br />propos,71 was for septic systems for both lots. <br />Mr. Olson questioned .that type of houses the applicant <br />intended to build? He said that he preferred not to have <br />enormous homes built. Mr. Munsing replied that custo,, homes <br />ranging in price between $300,000 to $400,000 would be built. <br />Gaffron noted that there would be need for a culvert and a <br />drainage easement would be taken. <br />There were no "urther comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows indicated chat she had not <br />been in favor of this subdivision when previously presented and <br />tha+ -,pinion had not changed. <br />lanning Commissioner Hanson said that this was not his <br />"favorite" subdivision, but he did not see any reason why it <br />should be denied. Bellows noted that the City prefers not to <br />create flag lots at all and this application would create two. <br />Bellows questioned the buildabiIity of the land and whether it <br />would support two houses. <br />It was moved by Planning Comm sioner Johnson, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson, ecommend approval of this <br />application for a preliminary bdivision. Motion, Ayes=2, <br />Cohen, Kelley, Bellows, Nay, Motic., failed. <br />1 <br />