My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3300 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-14-0058
>
Land Use
>
89-1442, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 10:06:56 AM
Creation date
10/14/2025 10:01:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
go <br />MINUTES Or Tnr pLANNINC- COIQIISSION MEE'Z'ING RELD AUGUST 17, 1987 <br />11172 BECK CONTINUED <br />placed 27 feet- from the lakeshore. The deck shall <br />replace the existing cement stairs paved stepped walk, <br />patio and storage structure located within 75 feet of <br />the lakeshore. The total hardcover to be removed is <br />509.5 s.f. providing a final reduction of 55.1 s.f. or <br />.50. She also noted that wetland areas are credited <br />against the hardcover, almost half of the property <br />consists of wetlands. The existing steps and patio are <br />34' from the lakeshore, and the proposed deck is 27' <br />from the lakeshore. <br />James Beck explained that the deck is designed to <br />provide a safe and easily negotiated access for elderly <br />individuals, which replaces the old patio. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to <br />recommend approval of the variances per staff <br />recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />101174 tRAIG R. ANDER:ON <br />'37S LUF STREET/3300 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />SUMIVISION <br />Scc IM REVIEW <br />Craig Anderson was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the <br />preliminary plat drawir•q submitted by applicant and <br />reviewed the staff sketch recommending to adjust the <br />proposed property line ~o provide a larger building <br />envelope for Lot 1 duc t. the steep slopes in Lot 1. <br />Variances are needed fu: lot width at 50' setback for <br />both lots. <br />Craig Anderson was agre(� ' :e to staff's recommended lot <br />line chanoj!!. <br />There were no comments ': .n the public regarding this <br />matter. <br />Bellows stated that alt...; qh the proposed subdivision <br />.echnically was allowed, .;.e felt it was bad planning to <br />create two flag lots wt•' would present many problems. <br />She felt the lot would 3, r . propriate for one house, <br />but would not support flag lot subdivison. <br />In response to the quest. -:r how this parcel of land's <br />configuration came abcut. .:sr .`ant Zoning Administrator <br />Gaff ron stated that w*,.- '.he entire parcel was <br />subdivided it left th-* . 1 -it with two rectangular <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.