Resolution 4839 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

: , , , ��=� , y �� . � o 0 ��b. - CITY of ORONO � � � ti �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ��sKO�`'� No. � � � 3 � 4. � The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. The property has been developed with a residential use since at least 1955. B. The existing residence on the property is in a non-conforming location too close to the front lot line, and will be removed. C. There is no additional land to combine with the properly. The property owner acquired property to the north of Brook Street,still extremely undersized for the LR-lA zoning district. It is similar to other developed lots in the neighborhood. D. The residence meets City ordinance standards for structural lot coverage. E. The residence meets City ordinance requirements for hardcover in the 500- • 1000' setback zone. � 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air,nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by. the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. � CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants • Page 2 of 7