My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2025 1:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/13/2025 1:05:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
643
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4�7 <br />L <br />TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: November 17, 1988 <br />Subject: #1346 Einar Hagberg, 740 North Arm Drive - <br />Variance - Referral From Council For Further Review <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Notice of Council Action Dated 10/26/88 <br />Exhibit B - Survey Showing Proposed Hardcover Removals <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 10/20/88 <br />Discussion - <br />The City Council reviewed this application at their October 24th <br />meeting, and voted 5 to 0 to refer this item back to Planning Commisison <br />for further consideration. Specifically, the Council asks Planning <br />Commission to determine whether a hardship exists and ask applicant to <br />consider alternatives to the additional accessory structure on the <br />property. <br />Note that Council indicated they would likely allow the proposed <br />garage to be 5' from the sewer line (see staff memo of 10/26). <br />Staff met with the applicant on 11/16/88 to discuss hardships and <br />alterratives. Applicant notes that he is willing to remove the 10' x 10' <br />tin shed near the boat house, since the shed is falling apart. He also is <br />willing to remove the plastic from the two areas shaded on the attached <br />survey. <br />In discussing the potential for expanding the existing garage the <br />applicant noted that the existing attached garage is only 2' from the side <br />lot line and extending it to create more storage space would involve an <br />extreme side setback variance. Also, it is apparert that expansion of the <br />existing garage further northward would be relatively expensive and would <br />eliminate his main entranceway to the house. There does not seem to be any <br />logical way to expand the existing garage. <br />Applicant notes he would prefer not to reduce the 24'x 24' dimension <br />of the proposed garage. His existing garage is not very big and contains <br />little storage space. Applicant noted he would provide for you a list of <br />the items he needs to store, which may provide the basis for a finding of <br />hardship. Note that with the proposed hardcover removals, final hardcover <br />will be decreased from 18.6% to 17.7% in the 0-75' zone. An error was <br />found in staffs 75-250' original hardcover calculations. Existing 75-250' <br />hardcover is 31.5%. Applicant proposes to remove 593 square feet of <br />plastic, resulting in final 75-250' hardcover of 6235 square feet or 28.7%. <br />Staff Recoa ndation - <br />Planning Commission is requested to determine whether a hardship has <br />been shown that justifies the proposed hardcover variance. If so, a <br />recommendation for approval would be appropriate, accompanied by a list of <br />the hardships. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.