My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2025 1:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/13/2025 1:05:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
643
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
gIMUTas or woui 1R oaollo COUMCYL MMMIMG MOVWUM 28,1968 <br />Z01IM T= -y 3'Jit --1MN W,- C0r-T1)W= <br />Road 84, would be a typical exytmla!'-_a- svutil__ section of a <br />M.S.A. road. <br />Mr. Armand Brachman asked who would have the final say as to <br />whether Brown Road would be improved? He suggested that a poll <br />of Brown Road residents would indicate that they would not wish <br />to have the road upgraded. He also asked about a proposal to <br />place a cul de sac at the end of North Brown Road and redirecting <br />traffic along a frontage road south of Mr. Rebers' property. He <br />again asked who would make a final decision to do that and felt <br />that there were other alternatives that may not require Brown <br />Road to be upgraded at all. Bernhardson said the it would be the <br />City Council's decision and should assessing be necessary, a <br />public hearing would be held. The issue of a cu l de sac would <br />also involve the City of Long Lake because a portion of Brown <br />Road does fall within Long Lake. <br />Mayor Grabek asked what factors were used to determine <br />whether a road needed upgrading? Public Works Director <br />Gerhardson replied that the type of traffic, condition of the <br />road and development in the area would all be factors. <br />Mr. Brachman observed that whether Hig;''way 12 was directed <br />north or stayed where it currently is, Brow,. Road would be cut <br />off. In his opinion, Brown Road, really di -is not serve as an <br />arterial road. Unfortunately it is used as a shortcut by many <br />people. He would rather minimize the amount of traffic, not <br />enhance it. Mayor Grabek sympathized with Mr. Brachman, but <br />stated that everyone living in Orono would like to see traffic on <br />their street minimized. He added that he would not be in favor <br />of upgrading Brown Road unless it was necessary. <br />George Johnson asked whether there were any plans to <br />straighten Brown Road so .'_t would align with Virginia Avenue? <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that option was raised <br />by MN DOT. It could be doodt on the southerly property without <br />impact to the present subdivision. Mr. Johnson said it would <br />have impact on a co 1 -acting area in a commercial area. <br />Bernhardson clarified that what MN DOT was proposing for 1991 was <br />providing turn lanes on Highway 12 between North Brown Road and <br />Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />Tin Adams wanted more information about the intersection and <br />the 'rontage road. He wanted to see the proposal as to an access <br />onto Highway 12. Shardlow said that the Comprehensive Plan <br />merely statan that a frontage road will be provided. Rebers has <br />proposed a location that would serve those parcels from the rear <br />that fronted on Highway 12. There are other alternatives. Until <br />development progresses. there really is no need to know where the <br />fjontage road will be, only that there will be one. City <br />Eng ed the various proposins on the sketch. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.