Laserfiche WebLink
Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation - <br />Zoning File #1350 <br />December 5, 1588 <br />The Planning Commission questioned the applicant regarding the <br />proposed addition in relation to the need for lakeshore and side setback <br />variances. The Planning Commission noted that we have no confirmation as <br />to the final upgrading of County Road 15 and rather than create a future <br />safety hazard by moving the structure closer to the road, the Planning <br />Commission would prefer recommending approval of the lakeshore setback <br />variance as proposed based on the hardship of the curva-ur_e of the <br />shoreline. <br />As for the side setback needed to provide the applicant with adequate <br />width for the two -stall garage, Planning Commission accepted the fact that <br />the lot line could still be rearranged but declined to take further dry <br />land area from the northern rural lot that remains unsewered. The proposed <br />division line represents a nature topographic boundary between the two <br />properties. The existing house is small with no additional storage area. <br />The proposed two -car garage and addition will provide much needed living <br />area. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the 2418" setback <br />for the addition. <br />The over-riding, positive aspect of the entire application has been <br />the major decrease of hardcover within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback area. <br />In the 0-75' we see a reduction of 6% hardcover, and in the 75-250' setback <br />area there is a reduction of 6%. As the staff memo noted above, there <br />would be an increase of 140 s.f. or 4% of hardcover within the 75-250' <br />setback area to cover a 4' wide path from the garage to the front entrance <br />door and the crushed rock landscaping with an underliner. <br />Vs enclosed resolution has been drafted based on the Planning <br />Commission's recommendatio-i of approval of the variances as proposed by the <br />applicant. <br />