My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2025 1:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/13/2025 1:05:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
643
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1349 <br />November 15, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />To approve the subdivision for a lot line rearrangement for Lauren <br />Born and David Halper and an area variance for Lot 2, Block 1 as a result <br />of this realignment based on the following findings: <br />1. The 37' wide corridor cannot be used for a new well location or <br />for septic expansion because of the 22'+ variation in grade from the <br />higher elevations of the Halper property used for current residential <br />development. <br />2. Proposed division line corresponds with natural <br />physical/topographic boundaries. <br />3. The subdivision does not involve the creation of new building <br />sites, but merely involves the rearrangement of a shared boundary. <br />4. The rural property, defined as Parcel A on the survey, has a new <br />primary septic system and additional area for septic expansion in the <br />future. <br />5. All existing structures on Parcel A meet the required setbacks <br />from the proposed division line. <br />This approval would be subject to Mr. Born filing for legal <br />combination of Parcel B with Parcel C. <br />For members who cannot approve a division that involves the reduction <br />in area of a rural property that would require an area variance, staff <br />would recommend that you refer to Section 11.02, Subdivision 10 for the <br />necessary findings for denial. <br />B. Vacation Application - <br />If the proposed division is appro•,ed, the existing 10' wide drainage <br />and utility easement along the southern lot line of Lot 2, Block 1, <br />Dragonfly Hill (review Exhibi ;) must be vacated and the city will ask in <br />return for the granting of a drainage and utility easement on either <br />side of the new division line. The existing drainage and utility easements <br />would intersect the newly defined building envelope of combined Parcel B 6 <br />no C. Mr. Halper and Mr. Born have agreed to execute drainage and utility <br />easements upon approval of the subdivision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.