My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2005 Board of Appeal and Equalization Reconvened Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
05-09-2005 Board of Appeal and Equalization Reconvened Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2025 2:38:23 PM
Creation date
10/9/2025 2:37:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
J <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />WcdMsday, April 20,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.ni. <br />Perl staled he has not had any contact with the Assessor’s Office and that his taxes have more than <br />doubled in two years. Perl indicated the roads near his residence are also in very poor shape and that he <br />would be willing to pay more in taxes if the roads were improved. Perl noted the amount of traffic on <br />Watertown Road has greatly increased, which has led to the deterioration of the road. <br />White noted that some of the roads in this area arc county or state roads. White indicated the City of <br />Orono is probably the third lowest taxing city in Hennepin County and that the City attempts to improve <br />some of the roads every year. White noted the roads were unable to be repaired earlier in the year due to <br />OtelwTd WMfher biil (hat repairs are now being done to some of the roads. <br />Perl stated Watertown Road is also being used considerably more since the Old Crystal Bay Road bridge <br />was removed and that the road has deteriorated considerably. <br />McMillan indicated the City of Orono currently does not have a road fimd and noted tint the City docs <br />r . collect all the taxes assessed against a property. <br />The Board requested the Assessor visit the Perl prtqierty. <br />4. Steve Poley, 2605 Thoroughbred, PID 04-117-23 11 0022. Poley indicated in his opinion his i axes arc <br />too high and that according to the Hennepin County web site, his neighbors are assess^ lower thin his. <br />Poley stated he has a completely unflnished basement and a smaller house than some of the other <br />residences in the immediate neighborhood. <br />Peterson inquired how big of an increase from last year Poley has experienced. <br />Poley stated his taxes have increased approximately IS percent from last year. Poley noted he has not <br />spoken with the assessor. Poley stated he would be agreeable to paying more taxes if his basement were <br />finished. <br />The Board requested the Assessor visit the Poley property. <br />5. Scott Winton, 2140 Carriage Lane, PID 10-117-23 24 0035. Winton indicated he also has visited the <br />Hennepin County web site and has compared the taxes of his neighbors with his residence. Winton suted <br />he constructed his house approximately four years ago and that his basement is not finished and has less <br />square footage than that of his neighbors. <br />Winton stated according to the web site, his taxes are the highest in his neighborhood. Winton noted his <br />taxes were decreased slightly last year after speaking with someone from the Assessor’s Office, but that <br />he is currently paying SI 1,850 and the other houses with more square fooUge and a pool are paying <br />between approximately S8,900 and SI0,000. <br />McMillan indicated what is important to this Board is the valuation of the pnqrerty. <br />■■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.