My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-2002 Board of Review Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
04-24-2002 Board of Review Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2025 2:17:35 PM
Creation date
10/9/2025 2:17:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
April 24.2002 (hand dclh-crcd)1 ^ <br />•V ‘f T - *'>t:, j • V. 4 V* w <br />Local Board of Appeal A Equali/nlion <br />%Orono City Hall <br />Appeal of Estimated Market Value and Market Value for Taxation for 2002 (2003 Taxes) <br />PropertylD 08-117-23 410001 <br />Property Address 3200 North Shore Drive, Wayzaia.Mn 55391 <br />Greetings, <br />We are questioning both ofthe abo\ e items. We ha\e had little opportuniiy to pull together information as <br />the Assessor’s office just returned our call yesterday. <br />The property right next to us recently sold for o\ er S20.000 less then our 2002 Est Market Value. It is ^te <br />ffimUy to ours - two bedroom older home, a little smaller, niih a two car garage. Their total land area is a <br />little smaller then outs but our property has three major easements that significantly reduce the usabilit)' - a <br />ten foot easement down the length (oi^ 57 feet wide to begin with); a sewer laimping lift station cuts th? <br />property in half anda sewer line cutting accrossed nearly the full widdi for a neighboring home. In <br />addition, there are overhead power lines to an at^jacem property cutting accrossed our land in another <br />foeat*"" Our useable land is less then the property that sold a^ is not on one continuous piece. <br />We therefore feel our Fri«n«t"d Market Value is at least S20.000 to high. We are unable to relate the <br />Limited Market Value to the Statue's requirements and question iv> calcubtion as being in compliance with <br />the law. Further, we have continually requested a ‘This (Md House’ e.xception for the impro\ cment we <br />made of adding the garage. That is not reflected in this statemern. <br />The increase in our Estimated Market Value was 20%i This is totally unrealistic and not supported by an <br />sale of similar property’ right next to us. We ha\ c a smalL older two bedroom home with a two car <br />gjiray dift floor in port ofthe basement, exposed piping in the kitchen, painted ceiling tiles in the halL <br />Some areas of the home are better then others. We ha\ c seen the inside of the other home and found <br />similar conditions. We knew and socialized with the gentleman that li\od in the other home before it was <br />sold. <br />We are concerned that overvaluing the property will negatively impact our ability- to maintain this home <br />thru our retiremenL We are not wealthy people. We saved to purchase the property-ar ’work long hours <br />to try to improve it and be good neighbors and responsible tax powers but we are also conixmed that lax <br />policy may well penalize us for our efforts. <br />We appreciate your consideiation of our appeal. <br />/Z <br />Shirley Hendrickson <br />Property- Owners and Residents <br />1 <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.