My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2002 Board of Appeal and Equalization Reconvened Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
05-13-2002 Board of Appeal and Equalization Reconvened Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2025 2:14:06 PM
Creation date
10/9/2025 2:11:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO BOARD OF REVIEW HEARING <br />Wednesday, April 24,2002 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Fames indicated in his view the property should be \-aIued at SI75.000. <br />White inquired whether the County Assessor’s Otlice is in possession of the information that Mr. Fames <br />distributed tonight. <br />Jensen indicated they do not have a copy of the information Mr. Fames distributed tonight. Jensen stated <br />the Board of Review will reconvene in 20 days, and in order for a further reduction in valuation to be <br />considered, the Assessor's Office will need to visit the property and will also need to be provided access <br />to the property since their office does not have a boat. <br />Fames indicated providing transportation to the island is a problem since his son is not here, but that he is <br />willing to provide a key to the residence so they may inspect the property. <br />Mayor Peterson stated it is the property owner’s responsibility to provide some transportation to the <br />property. <br />Jensen stated if they are unable to arrange for transportation out to the island, the nc.xt level of appeal <br />would be the County Board of Equalization. <br />Fames inquired whether there is state law requiring that they provide transportation for the Assessor’s <br />Office. <br />Mayor Peterson stated it is the property owner’s responsibility to provide transportation to the island. <br />Fames indicated he does not have a boat but he perhaps could rent a boat. <br />2. Jim Johnson. 2240 Fo.x Street. PID 03-117-23-32-0009, stated his proposed valuation for 2002 is <br />S488.000. Johnson stated in his view the property should be valued at S386.000. <br />Johnson indicated the property has been divided into three parcels, with the residence now being on three <br />acres of land and the other two lots being vacant at the present time. Johnson stated the propert>' has been <br />reduced from eight acres to three acres, but yet their taxable market value has increased from $315,500 to <br />S488.000, which amounts to a 55 percent increase. Johnson noted the limited market value increased <br />from $223,800 to $488,000, which is an increase of 118 percent. Johnson stated the intent of the <br />subdivision was to help lower the valuation on their land. <br />Johnson stated the land value is apparently based on a recent sale of a lot for $330,000, which consists of <br />five acres. Johnson stated in his opinion his land valuation based on the comparable should be $198,000, <br />with the house being valued at $188,000, for a total valuation of $386,000. <br />Johnson indicated they have had an independent appraisal done in 2000, whic’n suggested that the market <br />value of 2240 Fox was $350,000. Johnson stated based on some comparable properties in the area, an <br />appropriate 2002 valuation for 2240 Fox Street should be $223,800. <br />Jensen stated they have not physically reviewed this property, noting the last time this property was <br />visited was in 1998. Jensen stated they are using some land sales that occurred on Willow Drive and a <br />PAGE 3 <br />tirJWirr—
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.