My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#1734 Scanned File
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3750 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-21-0023
>
Land Use
>
92-1734, Subd.
>
#1734 Scanned File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2025 1:25:58 PM
Creation date
10/9/2025 1:24:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ll <br />POPHAM HAIK <br />SCHNOBRICH Be KAUF M A N , LTD . <br />U . 5 . O FF ICES : SUITE 3300 INTERNATI O NAL OFFICES : <br />D EN V ER , C O L O R A D O <br />TEL 303-89 3 -1200 <br />MI A M I, FLO R IDA <br />TE L 305-530-0050 <br />W ASHI N G T ON , 0 .C . <br />T E L 2 02-962 -8700 <br />VIA FACSIMILE <br />222 SOUTH NINTH STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS , MINNESOTA 55402 <br />TEL 612 -333 -4800 <br />FA X 612-334-8888 <br />THOMAS J . BARRETT, ESQ. <br />D I RECT DIAL (612) 334-2676 <br />May 12, 1992 <br />ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL <br />~[_ <br />LEIPZI G, GERMANY <br />TEL 01137-41-4918471 <br />STUTTGART,. GERM A N Y <br />TEL 01149-711 -296303 <br />MA Y 1 3 1992 <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Building and Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Municipal Offices <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 <br />Re: Application No. 1734 -John and Mary Burger <br />3750 Bayside Road -Preliminary Subdivision <br />Application <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />In response to your letter of May 1, 1992 with respect to <br />the application noted above, I point out that Orono Ordinance <br />601 subd. 2 specifically allows the City to regulate private <br />roads by allowing access over them to other persons who could <br />reasonably be expected to use the road to get to their home and <br />to their invitees. As I understand it the potential <br />intensification of the use is probably limited to one or two <br />homes which may use the private road in question in order to <br />achieve access. The alternative access which has been discussed <br />with respect to subdivision would require, as you point out in <br />your letter, a long and lengthy roadway through a designated <br />wetland. <br />I also understand that we can look forward to the new <br />users agreements to share in their prorata costs of the <br />maintenance of the road. <br />Thus, I conclude that the proposed use of Landmark Drive <br />is reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with both <br />our ordinance and other applicable law. <br />TJB/j ao/a47TJe
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.