Laserfiche WebLink
FROM POPHAM HAIK MPLS 133 5.12.1992 14: 18 F'. 2 <br />POPHAM HAIK <br />SCI-INOl!l~IC!-1 11 KAUFMAN, LTD. <br />U.S. OP'r.lCE'll: SUITE 3300 <br />222 SOUTH NINTH EITIH!.ltT <br />MINNl?.APOLIII. MINNESOTA IHl402 <br />TIH, Sl2-333-4B00 <br />I.J!.1 PZIO. CIR~MANY <br />Tl!.L 011 S7,41,,4Q\B,4,1 <br />MIAMI, FL.0!\IOA <br />VIA FACSIMILE <br />FhX e12.-3~4-8888 <br />THOMA• .J, ISAKlt1n·,•, 11!:•r.t• <br />DIAi.CT DIAL (812) lUt4-aa7a <br />May 12, 1992 <br />ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Building an~ Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Municipal Offices <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 <br />Re: Application No. 1734 -John and Mary Burger <br />3750 Bayside Road -Preliminary Subdivision <br />Application <br />Dear Jeanne: <br />In response to your letter of May 1, 1992 with respect to <br />the application noted above, I point out that Orono Ordinance <br />601 subd, 2 specifically allows the City to regulate private <br />roads by allowing access over them to other persons who could <br />reasonably be expected to use the road to get to their home and <br />to their invitees. As I understand it the potential <br />intensification of the use is probably limited to one or two <br />homes which may use the private road in question in order to <br />achieve access. The alternative access which has been discussed <br />with respect to subdivision would require, as you point out in <br />your letter, a long and lengthy roadway through a designated <br />wetland. <br />I also understand that we can look forward to the new <br />users agreements to share. in their prorata costs of the <br />maintenance 0£ the road. <br />Thus, I conclude that the proposed use of Landmark Drive <br />is reasonable under the circumstances and consistent with both <br />our ordinance and other applicable law.