Laserfiche WebLink
#2365 -Sketch Plan <br />May 11, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />these area variance cases were quite unique and the Council found them to be justified. In virtually <br />all other residential subdivisions since 1975, the City has held strictly to the minimum lot area <br />requirements. <br />The use of the wetland credit for sewered properties has been used in only a relatively small number <br />of residential subdivisions since the credit came into effect in 1970. It has also been used for at least <br />one identifiable 'existing lot of record' (West Ferndale Road). However, the City Council has <br />indicated that the provision of sewer to existing residences in the LR-IA district to solve pre-existing <br />septic system problems, must not be construed as an intent to suddenly allow the subdivision of <br />otherwise unsubdividable parcels in the 2-acre zone. In fact, staff has been able to identify no such <br />approvals occurring since the 2-acre zones were created in 1975. <br />Applicant's property contains only 3 .31 acres of dry buildable land, of which 0 .10 acres is a driveway <br />easement serving homes at 3770-3780 Bayside and is not creditable toward minimum lot area. The <br />property clearly does not not contain enough creditable area to be subdivided under the LR-IA <br />standards, unless one of the following occurs: <br />1. Applicant acquires additional adjacent contiguous dry buildable land (however, there <br />does not appear to be excess dry buildable in any adjacent property). <br />2. Council agrees to grant a second sewer unit and grants the wetland credit (which <br />Council has indicated is not their general intent for newly-sewered 2-acre zones; note <br />that Council has directed that a hearing be held for a zoning amendment to eliminate <br />the wetland credit entirely, which is scheduled for the May 18 meeting).). <br />3. The Council finds there is sufficient justification to grant a lot area variance (which <br />is unlikely because there is nothing unique about this situation as compared to the <br />two cases noted earlier). <br />4. The property and surrounding area is rezoned for smaller lot sizes (the Council has <br />consistently indicated over the last 20 years that zoning of the 2-acre districts will <br />not be changed just because sewer is provided). <br />Other Subdivision Issues/Factors <br />The site is served by a single driveway within proposed Lot 2, which could function as a shared <br />driveway for both Lots. The access situation would require review and approval by Hennepin <br />County since Bayside Road is County Road 84. Bringing a third user to the existing easement <br />driveway serving 3770-3780 is also an option for consideration, but brings up the issue of the need <br />for improving that to a private road standard.