My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4817
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4800 - 4899 (May 13, 2002 - November 25, 2002)
>
Resolution 4817
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 1:44:57 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:44:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, , <br /> �—'_ <br /> �� O ' V <br /> • O O <br /> ��b. - CITY of ORONO � <br /> � � � = <br /> �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��SH04'� NO. � � � `� <br /> B. The property is a conforming lot. Variances should only be considered <br /> when there are no other reasonable options on a properry. <br /> C. The garage addition could be shifted 9.5' to the west leaving a 30' <br /> setback. The impact on the house would result in the elimination of one <br /> garage door. The actual garage space would not be reduced. The fact <br /> that the proposed garage is attached to the house requires it to meet the <br /> � 30' setback for principal structures. <br /> � D. A detached building 750 s.f. or less is only required to meet a 10',,side <br /> setback. The detached building must have a minimum of 10' separation <br /> between it and the principal building. Sliding the garage back to be 10' <br /> from the principal building also moves the gazage back out of the 30' top <br /> of bluff setback, thus eliminating the need for any variances for the <br /> garage. � <br /> � 7. At the Council meeting of May 28, 2002 the applicants withdrew their request <br /> for variances to permit a side yard encroachment and bluff impact zone <br /> encroachment for an attached garage. <br /> 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely , <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and �� <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. � <br /> 9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the DNR, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance <br /> on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> � Pa e 3 of 7 <br /> g <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.