Laserfiche WebLink
.BGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JULY 12, 1982 <br />Page 4 <br />�UBD�YI S I ON <br />V 1340 Baldur <br />f 669 <br />Tonka Lake <br />Park Road <br />Properties <br />VARIANCE <br />1418 i 1420 Shoreline <br />677 <br />Gregory/Duff <br />Mayor Van Ne <br />preliminary <br />Properties <br />request of <br />Nays (0) . <br />st moved, Hurr seconded, to table the <br />subdivision request of Tonka Lake <br />for 1340 Baldur Park Road at the <br />the applicant. Motion, Ayes (4) - <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the <br />City Council the Variance request of William <br />Gregory, 1410 Shoreline Drive, stating that the <br />subdivision request is being held over until the <br />variance is approved. <br />Mr. Larry Berg, attorney for Willian Gregory, and <br />Mr. David Duff were present. <br />Mr. Berg explained the reason for the variance <br />request stating that his client wishes to buiild <br />an attached garage on the existing house on Lot 3, <br />and a new house on Lot 2, which does not require a <br />garage, as it would require too much fill in order <br />for the Gregorys to have an unobstructed view. <br />Discussion included rearranging the location of <br />the gx+rage and the proposed house; Duff Ia septic <br />system problem; and alternatives and on -site <br />systems. Mr. Berg requested a continuance so <br />that he could have a discussion with his client <br />and return to the Council table later in the <br />evening. <br />After returning to the Council table later in the <br />evening, Mr. Berg stated that the Gregorys gave <br />him permission to rearrange the lot lines so that <br />no variance would be required but after meeting <br />with their surveyor and architect, if the Council <br />would grant a variance on the other side of it, <br />about a 22' variance. <br />Mayor Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to draft a <br />resolution to deny the variance application as <br />requested by William Gregory, 1410 Shoreline <br />Drive, previously denied by the ►lanning <br />Commission, but to conceptually agree that if the <br />lot 1 i ne between Lots 2 and 3 were redrawn so that <br />