Laserfiche WebLink
TO: Walter R. Benson <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />DATE: July 7, 198_ <br />SUBJECT: #669 Tonka Lake Properties, 1340 Baldur Park - <br />Preliminar5 Subdivision <br />List of Exhibits <br />I'xhibit A - Notice to applicant <br />Exhibit B - Preliminary Plan <br />Exhibit C - Original packet (5-10-92) meeting <br />Subject: Update Memo <br />Mr. Peterson asks that Council act on the original 4 unit PRD <br />proposal reviewed by Council at your May 10, 1982 meeting. <br />Exhibit A is the copy of the notice sent to the applicant advising <br />him to consider revising preliminary plan to 3 unit density <br />with either a subdivision or PRD proposal. <br />The applicants have reviewed all aspects of the proposal finding <br />that in consideration of the total financial investment, the 4 <br />unit density is the only feasible choice. It is the applicants' <br />belief that they have responded in good faith to the original <br />directive of the Planning Commission and Council representative <br />at the first review meeting by providing extensive drainage plans. <br />They• feel they have addressed the quantity and quality of the <br />runuff c, ated by the additional hardcover with the 4 unit density. <br />It is tl r opinion that the treatment of the drainage with the <br />4 unit posal is environmentally more acceptable than the existing <br />drainay` with 1 unit. They would like to discuss their concern <br />with Council and also if desired submit the opinion of outside <br />experts in the field. <br />I note that Lhe City Engineer has not specifically reported on <br />the drainage plans submitted for the May meeting. Ile will be <br />advised of the applicants' plan to address this specific issue <br />and possibly prepare a report for the meeting night. <br />The original packet prepared for the May 10, 1982, meeting has <br />been enclosed for your review. <br />