My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1420 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-34-0014
>
Land Use
>
87-1228, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 12:11:04 PM
Creation date
10/7/2025 12:09:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 16, 1987 <br />i1226 WITTMER CONTINUED <br />problem. Regarding staff recommendation, h- asked to be <br />allowed a deck and stair system 6'x 8' in dimension. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closet. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Hanson, to <br />recommend approval of the variance per staff <br />recommendation conditioned upon removal of the 8'x 30' <br />deck to be replaced with a smaller deck and stair system <br />not to exceed 6'x 8' in dimension. Moiton, Ayes 5, Nays <br />0. <br />#1187 WORTH ARM ESTATES ASSOCIATION <br />215, 340, 350, 360 i 370 WORTH ARM LANE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />SECOND REVI= <br />Rod Backerud was present representing the North Arm <br />Estates Association. <br />Mabusth explained the request involving the creation of <br />berms to receive 25,000 cubit yards of spoils from the <br />suction dredging of the North Arm Channel. The revised <br />grading plans designate 2 berm areas now located out of <br />the 931.5 elevation. Each berm meets the 75' setback <br />from the lake (channel area) but the northern portions <br />of the berm now encroach within 26' of the the wetlands. <br />Berms are constructed with 4" PVC pipe at 2' height <br />intervals. Mabusth noted that the MCWD has not yet <br />given approval of the project. <br />Rod Backerud explained the process involved and length <br />of time involved. <br />Bellows stated she was very leary of this type of <br />project being started at this time of year and the <br />impact of a freeze -thaw cycle. <br />Staff did not have a definite answer to whether a <br />freeze -thaw cycle would adversely affect this project. <br />It was moved by Brown, seconded by Hanson, to recommend <br />approval per staff recommendation subject to applicant <br />working with staff regarding the freeze -thaw concerns; <br />and noting that the plan indicates a slight encroachment <br />in the 26' wetland setback. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Brown, to approve <br />the Minutes of the October 19, 1987 Planning Commission <br />meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.