Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M I NUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION ME:F.T I NG HE;I,D ON SE:PTYMBEA 24, 1. 979 4. Quit Claim Deed for right-of-way to CSAN 6, to also include extended ditch area - to be deeded to County. S. Payment of Park Dedication Fee of $200.00 (4100.00 each lot). 6. Title opinion - current addrassed t.n City. Motion seconded by McDonald. Votes Ayes (4), Nays (0) . Motion passeeed unanimously. The applicant proposes constructing a 28' X 24' garage requiring a side yard variances of 8' And street setback variance of 6'. The Wittmerrs do not have a garage, at prosent. The new yarage± will not only store the family cars, but server as the main storage area for the residence as it dues not have a basement. The applicant will remove the nr)n-conforming shed (8' X 12') when the garage is built. Frahm questioned the need for ^uch a large garage especially in an Application where a hardrnkfrr variances is required. Planninq Commission noted that most of they garages on BAldur Park Area were located near the road and that this was the last. developed property to require a variance for a new garage. PACE 2 WII.I.IAM PEARCE 1405/1485 Sixth Ave. Net. PREI,IMINARY SUBDIVISION i Public Inrormation Etg. (0495) Cont. V/WAI,,rrR WITTMER 1420 Raldur Pr.:k Road VARIANCE: (A509) McDonald moved to recommend approval of the variance request as they special conditions applying to the structure anti land in question are peculiar to such property or immeadiattly surrounding property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which :said land is located, the granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or general welfare, the grant ia(*I of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive I.and Use Plan or the ?.caning Code, and the granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties and that this is the last developed property to require a variance for a garage. Motion seconded by Hammerel. Votes Ayes (i)• Nays (1) Motion passed. Frahm voted against the requer noting that the garage size could have been decreased and that this proposal will acid to an area that is alreaay overburdened with excess hardcover and severe drainage, problems.