My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 9:46:47 AM
Creation date
10/7/2025 9:37:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO P1XP1ING COMMISSION <br />Septq:nber 10, 19;3 <br />-= =•"-13 rprz_:sa, and <br />reasonable;.imi:atitns on stree_ : a^c- :s in ne <br />future. <br />2. Require the Street to be Looped, or the Connection With the <br />�3t"Ibbed ",. -tie 'qes- <br />2,100 feet is more than two times the ordinance maximum length <br />for public streets and there is clearly sufficient <br />justification for either of the options stated above. It :nay <br />be possible to refine the grading plan to take fewer trees. <br />Perhaps a short stretch of very steep grade and the use of <br />retaining walls could make a significant difference. <br />3. Require the Construction of an Emergency vehicle Only <br />Access <br />Another alternative would leave the lot configuration as is, <br />thus saving as many trees as possible. An emergency access <br />could be provided along the short stretch of the proposed <br />private trail between Pine Ridge Trail and the interior street. <br />The specific nature of this connection could be studied in <br />greater detail. In its final fo rn it could be greatly <br />camouflaged and be designed to preclude trespass by <br />recreational vehicles. We would want to talk to both the City <br />Engineer and the Fire Department about this facility, but there <br />is no reason why it could not be designed to be attractive and <br />to fit into the proposed development. <br />In summary, this application requires that the Planning <br />Commission and City Council carefully reevaluate the issue of <br />maximum cul-de-sac length for private streets. It also demands <br />a careful review and consideration of its unique merits. When <br />this review has been completed, the City will be in a position <br />to take an action that is reasonable both to Mr. Rebers and to <br />future applicants. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.