My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 9:46:47 AM
Creation date
10/7/2025 9:37:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #)1296 - Add-n Comments to June 17, 1988 Memo <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />Staff would add to the factual findings presented for this review: <br />RLS 1216 was filed on May 8, 1967. The half acre lot standard was <br />established for this area and subdivision regulations were also established <br />for the City (this is approximately the time that the Minnetonka Highlands <br />Plat was being reviewed by the City). <br />Staff has reviewed the 1967 Council minutes and can find no record of <br />this division being approved by the City. It would be of interest to ask <br />the Gustofsons, the original purpose of RLS 1216. <br />Planning Commission Itecos ndation - <br />Planning Commission recommended denial of the lot area application of <br />Rick Stodola and Merritt Peterson for Tracts F 6 G of RLS 1216 based on the <br />findings cited by staff on Page 3 of this memo and further advised the <br />applicants that an accessory dock was not an acceptable accessory use for <br />this property and noted the following findings: <br />1. The lack of a principal structure and the heavy natural screening <br />that shields the dock area from public view, makes policing and <br />protection of the dock on the private property difficult if not <br />impossible. <br />2. An adjacent neighbor already has a dock located on the same <br />property. <br />3. The property is not wide enough to provide adequate parking that <br />would meet the required setback of 75' from the main lake (channel <br />area). Parking is also not allowed along this section of County Road. <br />4. Approval of the use of an accessory structure, such as a dock, <br />without a principal structure would establish a negative precedent in <br />dealing with similar requests in lots of similar size. <br />options of Action Available to Council - <br />1 . To table pending further review by City Attorney regarding the <br />following issues. <br />a) Question of taking? (Property was never assessed for sewer <br />or water. Market valuat:.on of property suggested <br />unbuildability.) <br />b) Ability of City to question the Gustafsons regarding their <br />plans for the remaining tracts within RLS 1216 and the claim by <br />applicants that Gustafsons have a gentlemen's agreement with <br />Tillotson for the sale of portions of Parcel 0003. <br />c) Other issues Council may deem important for this review. <br />3. To deny and to direct staff to draft the appropriate denial <br />resolution for presentation at the Council meeting of July 25, 1988. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.