My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
11-28-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 9:46:47 AM
Creation date
10/7/2025 9:37:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TEE ORONO COUWIL MEETING OF /0VEl18ER 14, 1968 <br />APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR CONTINUED <br />Ayes-3, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />EAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS <br />4545 *ATQTOMN ROAD <br />RESOLUTION #2540 <br />Mr. Jim Miller, the manager of the subject property, was <br />present on Mr. Earl Freeman's behalf. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the list of <br />items set forth in the Resolution would need to be addressed <br />before occupancy could resume. The City Attorney would file this <br />matter with the court. The Court would set a schedule as to when <br />the building must be repaired. If the owner fails to meet that <br />schedule the building would be torn down. <br />Mr. Miller asked whether he would need to have all of the <br />items listed repaired? He cited, as an example, that the rooms <br />are too small. He asked how he could remedy that item. <br />Bernhardson recommended that Mr. Miller meet with Building <br />Inspector Jacobs. He said that Mr. Jacobs could identify those <br />items, if any that would not require repair prior to the Court <br />Order being rescinded. <br />Councilmember Nettles inquired as to whether the building <br />would need to be enlarged before it would meet Orono's standards, <br />or whether it could be "grandfathered"? Zoning Administrator <br />Mabusth stated that would need further review. <br />Councilmerber Goetten asked what time frame the owner would <br />be given before the matter was filed with the court? Bernhardson <br />replied that Mr. Miller would have approximately 10 days to <br />determine which items needed to be addressed. However, if it <br />appears as though the building cannot be repaired, the City would <br />proceed with the court after that time period. <br />It was moved by Counci lmember Nettles, Seconded by Acting <br />Mayor Peterson, that they adopt Resolution #2540, initiating <br />Hazardous Building Proceedings at 4545 Watertown Road. Motion, <br />Ayes-3, Nays-0, Motion passed. <br />PRO"ND ORDINAMCE AMSMDNMT <br />DOG LICENSE <br />ORDINANCE #59, 2ND SERIES <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the City was <br />proposing to modifv the language pertaining to rabies <br />certificates. The modification would specify that rabies <br />certificates must be valid for the period of the dog license. <br />Acting Mayor Peterson asked why the hours pertaining to <br />barking dogs were 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 P.M. She observed that <br />there were citizens in the community that worked various shifts <br />and may be sleeping during those hours. Bernhardson replied that <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.