11-14-1988 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1988 ZONING FILE #1321 TOM BAISLET CONTINUED Zoning Administrator Mabusth reported that the applicant had reviewed the 8 concerns set forth in her memo that needed to be included in the agreement. Items 3, 6 and 7 will be futher defined and worked on by the City Attorney and Mr. Leung with staff 'a input. With regard to Item #2, Mabusth presented two possible schemes of development of the eastern parcel. The problem is the possibility of a developer coming in to the east who will be expected to address a future road connection to the proposed road outlot within the current development. The City will be obligated to inform such a developer of that agreement with the School Board. Mr. Leung stated that the reason he had asked Ms. Mabusth to make that clarification was to verify the fact that the School District would not be obligated to develop the road. There cannot be a road running through the School's property for many reasons, but mainly due to safety. Mayor Grabek stated that the agreement would protect both the City and School District. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2513. Councilmember Callahan inquired about the park and road fees required with all subdivision applications. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission had overlooked the fees in their attempt to resolve all of the aspects of this application. Mabusth interpreted the Planning Commission's intentions would be not to charge the School District for those fees. There was no further discussion. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1324 MR. AND MRS. WILLIAM GREGORY 1099 TAMARACK DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #241.4 Mr. Clifford Reep, from Minnetonka Portable Dredging was present on behalf of the applicants. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the applicants were seeking a conditional use permit to excavate an existing wetland to create a wildlife pond. A 1 1 of the dredging or grading that would be done would be retained on the property. Even though the wetlands are being enlarged and deepened, there wi 111 be no increase in the ponding area. Because of the configuration, it will lessen the storm ponding area by 9%. When dealing with ponding, it is the outlet that determines the amount of storage, not the depth of the pond. The ponding area would still have capacity to handle the 100-year storm. Mayor Grabek asked whether this would disturb the wetland area? Bernhardson replied that it would be disturbing the wetlands, but the applicants have received approval from the 13