My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
11-14-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2025 9:12:02 AM
Creation date
10/7/2025 9:03:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTE: OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1988 <br />HIGHWAY 12 ZONING AMENDMENT <br />Commission wanted to guarantee quality and consistency. The PUD <br />would allow that to happen. Mayor Grabek asked why a PRD would <br />not take care of that? Shardlow stated that a PRD only deals <br />with the density issue. <br />Mayor Grabek stated that he understood the need to focus <br />development in a certain area to benefit not only the lend, but <br />the surrounding area. However, in his opinion, a PUD would give <br />the City the ability to control the density. The PRD would allow <br />the clustering of a development for the purpose of preserving <br />wetlands or other unique geographical conditions. Councilmember <br />Callahan stated that the PUD would allow for a gas <br />station/grocery store on one acre and an apartment complex on <br />another acre, with a commercial office building. Mayor Grabek <br />stated that he understood the aspect of density, however, he did <br />not see where there would be controls or restrictions. Shardlow <br />stated that the PRD would only apply to residential property. A <br />PUD would apply to all types of property. The idea of the PUD <br />was to require an applicant for rezoning along the Highway 12 <br />Corridor to present their design framework Manual so that all <br />buildings and landscaping would meet certain standards prior to <br />approval. It would enhance the discretion that the City would <br />have for prior to approval. <br />Councilmember Goetten inquired as to whether there would be <br />any "loopholes" that would enable an undesireable development <br />within tho Orono Community if the PUD were allowed. Shardlow <br />stated th«t this ord_ nance would provide the City with a process <br />that would allow more guarantees and controls before development <br />begins. M.yor Grabek asked why that could not be done without a <br />PUD? City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the PRD is <br />very limited in that it applies mainly to density. Th�-r•e are <br />PID's, PCD' 3 and other such zoning designations in other C* i ties <br />that provid detailed controls for development. The PUD cor._nes <br />the controls of all those zoning districts and eliminate:; the <br />need to have more than one. The current PRD is rot that <br />extensive. The PUD also allows for a mixed use development where <br />residentia' development could be integrated with office buildings <br />and other corms of commercial development. <br />Mayor Grabek asked whether the PUD could be designated for <br />use only within certain areas of Orono, such as Navarre and the <br />Highway 12 Corridor> Shardlow stated that conceptually he would <br />see no reason why such limitations could not be established. <br />Bernhardson suggested that a PUP in the 2 and 5 acre zones not be <br />allowed to increase the density credit. The other sewered areas <br />could be considered if allowing an increase in density credit <br />were desired. The primary purpose of the PUD is not to allow <br />increased density, but rather to allow better use and control. <br />Councilmember Nettles inquired as to whether Orono could <br />legislate the types of uses it would allow or disallow for a PUD. <br />Councilmember Callahan stated that he favored the idea of <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.