Laserfiche WebLink
. ����- � <br /> � <br /> • 0 �. � � <br /> � CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� -: : � <br /> ti <br /> ��L �G~' RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �kESI�Og' NO. � � � � . <br /> 3. "Motor fuel station"is allowed as a conditional use in the I district per Zoning Code <br /> Section 10.50 Subd. 3(A)(4). <br /> 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 19, 2003 and <br /> recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. <br /> 5. The Planning Commission made the following fmdings of fact: . <br /> A. The Planning Commission finds the t�vo vaulted fuel storage tanks will be <br /> located at the southeast corner of the building, approximately 250'from the <br /> � east lot line and 350' from the south lot line. Section 9.34 requires a <br /> minimum side/rear property line setback of 50'which is more than adequately <br />' met. No canopy is proposed, and the vaults will be located to the rear of the <br />' building where they will be virtually invisible from existing Highway 12,and <br /> • not visible from new 12. No ancillary lighting or signage is proposed,and no <br /> additional screening of this system will be necessary. <br /> B. The proposed fuel system will meet all pertinent standards of Section 9.34. <br />� The Orono Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and the location of the <br /> proposed vaults,and lias recommended that the proposal be approved,subj ect <br /> to meeting all City and Fire code requirements. The vaults will be located in <br /> an area of the site that is currently paved and was approved for parkin� of <br /> vehicles to be repaired. There is a minor reduction in the number of pazking <br /> stalls available for that use as a result of the tank location. There are no <br /> � - � draina;e issues associated with the proposal. � <br /> C. Per the prior approvals,the north side of the building will be modified to be <br /> _ the primary customer entrance to the site. Those plans also noted the . � <br /> building fa�ade would be repainted. Due to the varied nature of the east <br /> facade of the front half of the building,the owner has chosen to resurface the <br /> existing block wall with EIFS as opposed to merely painting that facade. <br /> D. The owner was advised in Condition No. 9 of Resolution No. 4845 that <br /> � access to the site may change in the future and the owner a�eed to discuss <br /> _ the matter at such time that the City or adjacent landowners initiate such <br /> discussion. The owner has initiated discussions with Lon�Lake to attempt to <br /> • Page 2 of 6 <br />