My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4992
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4900 - 4999 (November 25,2002 - June 23,2003)
>
Resolution 4992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 1:36:12 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:36:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, , ? • <br /> . ` 7' O� <br /> • O �, O <br /> � C ITY of ORONO <br /> a - , _ � <br /> , ti <br /> ��L �G�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `�kESKo4' rvo. 4 9 � � <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 19, 2003 <br /> and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The proposal reduces hardcover within the 0-75' setback one; � <br /> B. Removal of the existing stairs and retaining walls require filling in the bluff <br /> impact zone where no fill is permitted. However, stairs and landings are <br /> permitted within the bluff impact zone; <br /> � C. Properties with major topographic changes,prohibiting a property owner to <br /> access the lake, are permitted to have one set of 4' wide stairs with 32 s.f. <br /> landings to access the lakeshore; and <br /> D. There is an existing deck within the 0-75' setback zone which is . <br /> nonconforming and in need of structural repairs. The property owners were <br /> • notified in a previous resolution that structural repairs to the deck would <br /> require City approval. � <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty;is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> ke.eping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> � City. <br /> _ 6. 'The City Council has considered this application, including the findings and � <br /> recoinmendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> CONCLUSIONS, ORDER,AND CONDITIONS <br /> Based upon one or more of the above findings,the Orono City Council hereby grants variances from <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56,Subdivision 16(J)(2);Section 10.22,Subdivision 2;Section <br /> 10.56,Subdivision 16(L)(1);Section 10.56,Subdivision 16(L)(2);and Section 10.56,Subdivision <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.