Laserfiche WebLink
09-3428 <br />12 November 2009 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Additionally , the revision proposes to meet the 50' setback on the western Bayside portion <br />of the property and will only be 2 feet short of the 50' setback on the Crestview side of the <br />lot. Moving the home further farther from the creek results in a 60 ' setback where 75' is <br />required an improvement of 10 feet from the previous plan . This shifting of the home to the <br />north allows for only an 11 ' setback from the side lot line and adjacent neighbor's property <br />where a 30 ' setback is required. A 16 foot setback was initially proposed. <br />The Planning Commission also indicated that the inclusion of hardcover mitigation <br />measures such as native vegetation buffers , rain gardens , pavers , etc was encouraged . <br />The applicants continue to propose to incorporate wetland buffers in the required areas as <br />well as additional areas in order to attempt to mitigate for the excesses in hardcover. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Have the applicants fully addressed the areas of concern outlined by the Planning <br />Commission at the October meeting? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission feel that the proposed hardcover has been <br />adequately mitigated with the applicants ' proposal? <br />3. The applicants' have proposed a 22 ' setback between their proposed home and the <br />adjacent neighbor's home. Does the proposed and existing vegetation provide <br />sufficient screening for privacy? Does the 22 foot separation allow for appropriate <br />open space between dwellings in the context of this neighborhood? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff still believes the design of the house does not fit the constraints of the property . The <br />shape of the house seems to be a desire of the applicants to re-recreate their existing <br />residence rather than design a home better suited to the property . That being said Planning <br />Staff continues to recommend the following : <br />1. Denial of the hardcover variance and structural setback variance to allow the foot <br />bridge. <br />2. Approval of the conditional use permit subject to the MCWD requirements for the <br />stream bank stabilization and the City Engineer's recommendations. <br />3. Approval of the lot area variance conditioned upon the combination of the 4 lots into <br />one tax parcel prior to the issuance of a building permit and compliance with the <br />wetland buffer requirements. <br />Further Planning Staff recommends : <br />1. Approval of the proposed side and street setback variances as revised . The creek <br />setback encroachment could be further improved upon however staff feels the <br />applicants have met the direction of the Planning Commission . <br />2. Approval of some level of hardcover variances as the Planning Commission deems <br />appropriate in conjunction with the following : <br />a. Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures consisting of native <br />vegetation areas between the home and the creek . <br />b. Patios , sidewalks , courtyard and driveway to be constructed using pavers.