Laserfiche WebLink
17 November 2009 <br />09-3428 <br />Page 2 <br />was cited as a priority. The Planning Commiss ion seemed to feel the CUP for stream bank <br />stabilization and the variances for the proposed footbridge over the creek were acceptable . <br />At the November 161h meeting although the applicants had not completely eliminated the <br />encroachment and hardcover within 75 ' of the creek the Commission felt the applicants had followed <br />their general direction with the ir revisions. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />revised plans with a 5-0 vote . <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Staff still feels the proposed home has not been designed for the property and a different home <br />design could better accommodate the challenges of the lot spec ifically the creek setback . Staff also <br />continues to recommend denial of the footbridge over the creek . There are existing alternatives for <br />access to the southern portion of the property via Crestview or Bayside Road . <br />Staff has prepared a Resolution based on the Planning Commission 's recommendations of approval <br />of the variances and conditional use permit. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Adopt or amend the attached Resolution.