Laserfiche WebLink
( <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 16, 2009 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#09-3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYN HUTHW AITE, 3382 BAYSIDE ROAD, CONTINUED) <br />ten feet from the previous plan. This shifting of the home to the north allows for only an 11-foot setback <br />from the side lot line and adjacent neighbor 's property where a 30-foot setback is required. A 16-foot <br />setback was initially proposed. <br />The Planning Commission also indicated that the inclusion of hardcover mitigation measures such as <br />native vegetation buffers, rain gardens , pavers, etc., was encouraged. The applicants continue to propose <br />to incorporate wetland buffers in the required areas as well as additional areas in order to attempt to <br />mitigate for the excesses in hardcover. <br />Staff still believes the design of the house does not fit the constraints of the property. The shape of the <br />house seems to be a desire of the applicants to re-recreate their existing residence rather than design a <br />home better suited to the property. Staff recommends the following: <br />1. Denial of the hardcover variance and structural setback variance to allow the foot bridge. <br />2. Approval of the conditional use permit subject to the MCWD requirements for the stream bank <br />stabilization and the City Engineer's recommendations . <br />3. Approval of the lot area variance conditioned upon the combination of the four lots into one tax <br />parcel prior to the issuance of a building permit and compliance with the wetland buffer <br />requirements. <br />4. Approval of the proposed side and street setback variances as revised. The creek setback <br />encroachment could be further improved upon; however, Staff feels the applicants have met the <br />direction of the Planning Commission. <br />5. Approval of some level of hardcover variances as the Planning Commission deems appropriate in <br />conjunction with the following: <br />a . Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures consisting of native vegetation areas <br />between the home and the creek. <br />b. Patios, sidewalks, courtyard and driveway to be constructed using pavers. <br />Mr. Huthwaite stated they would like to purchase this property for their retirement home and that there <br />are a number of problems with the current house, which is the reason for their proposal to raze the <br />structure and construct a new residence. The creek is a Management III wetland, which is a minimum <br />type of wetland, and their plan helps to mitigate the erosion that is presently occurring. <br />As previously mentioned, a substantial amount of work has been done to their plans. The garage has been <br />reduced, the size of the living/dining room area has been reduced, and the patio areas have also been <br />reduced. As a result of that, the house has been re-angled and relocated further north. The hardcover area <br />in the 0-75 foot zone has been reduced by approximately 1,000 square feet. Given the changes , Mr. <br />Huthwaite requested the Planning Commission approve their application. <br />Rahn asked what the setback is for the existing home on the side with the proposed 11-foot setback.