Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

( Subject: #09-3428 Michael & Marilyn Huthwaite 3382 Bayside Road LS fd@o~,i;.l,aag £ijj,fullfl@Ji.@"'8~ At the October meeting , the applicant was directed to explore reducing the footprint of the proposed home in order to better fit inside the required setbacks ; the creek setback was cited as a priority. Reduction of the garage square footage to alleviate some of the encroachment into the creek setback was also suggested . The applicants have reduced the overall size of the home footprint by only 167 square feet; however they have reduced the proposed patios , reoriented the driveway and vehicle courtyard and have proposed a significant reduction in the portions of the home and hardcover to be located within the 75' creek setback. Their initial proposal was for 2,322 square feet of hardcover within the 0-75' zone. Their revision reflects a 965 square foot reduction within this zone . The revis ions result in 365 additional proposed square feet within the 75 ' -250 ' zone. Additionally, the revision proposes to meet the 50' setback on the western Bayside portion of the property and will only be 2 feet short of the 50' setback on the Crestview side of the lot. Moving the home further farther from the creek results in a 60' setback where 75' is required an improvement of 10 feet from the previous plan. This shifting of the home to the north allows for only an 11' setback from the side lot line and adjacent neighbor's property where a 30' setback is required .. A 16 feet !etbael< 'N8! il"litielly J:)FoposecL The Planning Commission also encouraged the inclusion of hardcover mitigation measures such as native vegetation buffers , rain gardens, pavers , etc. The applicants continue to propose to incorporate wetland buffers in the required areas as well as additional areas in order to attempt to mitigate for the excesses in hardcover. Staff still believes th¥~~if the house does not fit the constraints of the property . In summary, Planning Staff continues to recommend the following : 1. Denial of the hardcover variance and structural setback variance to allow the foot bridge . 2 . Approval of the conditional use permit S1:Jejeet te tl:ie MCWD , eq~i, e,, ,e, ,t! for the stream bank stabilization e, .el ti ,6 City E11gi. 1se1 1s , eco,. 11. ,er.detiel"ls. 3 . Approval of the lot area variance conditioned upon the combination of the 4 lots into one tax parcel prior to the issuance of a building permit and compliance with the wetland buffer requirements . r (( [et)J Further Planning Staff recommends : ,s,ttlff ~ti 1. Approval of the proposed side and street setback variances as revised . 1The creek ~ setback encro~~~c;O.t.!Ld_b~ further improved upon however !teff feels tlie ,} .d1)J ~pplicants have ' l'lie airec1ion' of the Planning Commission . Yl1'f'. 2. Approval of some · 1evel of hardcover variances as the Planning Commission deems appropriate ~ oe11jll!J.9I011 ,witl, ti ,e fellewiR9:_=:-. . . a . lmple~~~1on of; proposed m,~oon -measures consisting vegeta~~-~reas bet een the hom7"9nd the creek. b. Patio,s , sidewalks , cou yard an,.9 <:lriveway to be co structed u ng pavers. ·, / ' \ ./