My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3382 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-14-0069
>
Land Use
>
09-3428, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 2:38:13 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 2:34:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subj ec t: #09 -3428 Michael r ~arilyn Huthw aite 3382 Bayside Road <br />Background p,,. fl) f~ o-,t lfjl5IA-r ~- <br />3382 Bayside Road consists of four separate tax parcels under one address where a home has existed for a <br />number of years . The applicants wish to redevelop and construct a new single family residence on the <br />property. Because of the lot area requirements of the LR-1 A district, variances are required in order to do so . <br />Additionally, the applicants are requesting creek setback, side and street yard setback, 0-75' and 75'-250 ' <br />zone hardcover variances as well as a conditional use permit to conduct land a lteration work within the creek <br />and creek banks . The redevelopment of the property has also triggered the application of the City's wetland <br />regulations, requiring a buffer. <br />Variances <br />Street and Side Yard Setback: The applicants' proposed home encroaches into all of the required yard <br />setbacks. They have proposed a 41.2 foot setback from Crestview , which will essentially become their <br />fronUstreet yard with the driveway reorientation; a 48.2 foot setback from Bayside Road is proposed where a <br />50 foot setback is requi red from both streets . They have proposed 16 .9 foot to 24 foot setbacks from the <br />side lot lines where 30 feet is required. <br />Creek Setback: The house would be as close as 48 feet to the creek when the shoreland regulations require <br />a 75 foot setback. <br />Hardcover: Hardcover in the O to 75 foot zone is proposed to be 11 .24%, reduced slightly from the existing <br />11.4%. Hardcover within the 75'-250' zone jumps from an existing 11 .1 % to 33.6% proposed . In addition to <br />the proposed 3,682 s.f. home and 715 square feet of proposed patio, and 2,018 square feet of hardcover in <br />the driveway and courtyard, there are 315 square feet of groposed retaining walls and a pro Qosed foot bridge <br />spanning the creek. <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />Since the earthwork will take place within the creek, within the O to 75 foot zone and exceeds 10 cubic yards <br />a conditional use permit is required. <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the 4 issues for Consideration outlined within the Staff <br />Report. <br />Di sc ussio n <br />While the property is undersized staff finds that a reasonable home could be constructed within the required <br />setbacks, although perhaps not as architecturally attractive as the proposed house . Considering the <br />disproportionate lot area and zoning requirements it may be reasonable to grant setback variances to the <br />side and even street yard requirements. However staff consistently holds to the lake and creek setbacks <br />where feasible . <br />Regarding the hardcover levels proposed staff finds that although the applicant has proposed beneficial <br />changes to the property, specifically moving the gravel driveway out of the 75' setback, and proposing a <br />significant amount of vegetative buffer, there is still a large amount of excess hardcover proposed on the <br />property . The square footage of the proposed home, vehicle courtyard and patios are inconsistent with the <br />philosophy of maintaining the minimum level of hardcover necessary to have reasonable use of the property <br />and protection of surface water resources. <br />The proposed bridge over Stubbs Bay Creek poses a number of issues. <br />• City Code prohibits structures within 75' of this Protected Tributary. <br />• The bridge constitutes hardcover within 75' of the tributary, which is not allowed City Code. <br />• The bridge cannot be considered the equivalent of a "stairway, lift, landing or lockbox " that would be <br />allowed at the shoreline of a lake because it is not needed for access to the shore due to the <br />presence of a bluff or steep slope . <br />• The bridge aQpears to function merely as an amenity to the pro P.erty -it is no t necessary to access to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.