My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3382 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-14-0069
>
Land Use
>
09-3428, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 2:38:13 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 2:34:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. ON SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE -BARRY TANNER AT 3435 SHORELINE D <br />Bremer move , ranchot seconded, to approve the On Sale 3.2 Percent Ma iquor License for <br />Barry Tanner at varre Lanes located at 3435 Shoreline Drive effectiv anuary 1, 2010, through <br />December 31, 2010. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTATIVE <br />Kang stated she had nothing to report b would be avai <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />ZONING ADMINISTRA TO S REPORT <br />*5. #08-3382 BE HIRE PARTNRS, LLC, 2745 KELLEY P <br />LDING II) -FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />. 5886 <br />PROFESSIONAL <br />RESOLUTION <br />WAY(ORONO <br />PROV AL EXTENSION - <br />Bremer m ed, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5886, a Resolu · Extending the <br />Approv s for Planned Unit Development No. 3B Orono Professional Center II and ending <br />Res tion No. 5783. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. #09 -3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYN HUTHW AITE, 3382 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 5887 <br />Jeremy Steiner, Attorney-at-Law, and Rick Hendel, Builder, were present. <br />Curtis noted the applicant originally was requesting a conditional use permit for grading within 75 feet of <br />Stubbs Bay Creek as well as lot area, creek setback, and hardcover within the 0-75 foot and 75-250 <br />setback zone variances in order to construct a replacement residence . At that time the Planning <br />Commission directed the applicant to address the following : <br />1. The footprint of the home should be reduced in order to better fit within the required street, side, <br />and creek setback. The creek setback was identified as a priority . <br />2. The attached garage could be reduced in order to alleviate a portion of the encroachment into th e <br />creek setback. <br />In addition, the Planning Commission seemed to feel the CUP for stream bank stabilization and the <br />variances for the proposed crossing or footbridge over the creek were acceptable. <br />PAGE2of8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.