My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3382 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-14-0069
>
Land Use
>
09-3428, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 2:38:13 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 2:34:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JEREMY S . STEINER* <br />WYNN CURTISS <br />JASON T. HUTCHISON <br />*Real Property Law Specialist, certified <br />by the Minnesota Srate Bar Association <br />STEINER & CURTISS, P.A. <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />400 WELLS FARGO BANK BUlLDING <br />1011 FIRST STREET SOUTH <br />HOPKINS , MN 55343 <br />Writer's Direct Dial No. 952-938-6219 <br />October 7, 2009 <br />Melanie Curtis, Planning and Zoning Coordinator <br />City of Orono <br />BY EMAIL <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />Orono, MN 55356 <br />Re: Variance & CUP Application for3382 Bayside Road <br />Dear Melanie: <br />PC Exhibit K <br />(952) 938 -7635 <br />FAX (952) 938-7670 <br />This letter is submitted on behalf of Michael and Marilyn Huthwaite in response to your email of <br />October 6 requesting that the Huthwaites address certain issues identified in the October 6, 2009, letter <br />from the City's Engineer commenting on the Huthwaites' proposed plans. The issues identified in the City <br />Engineer's letter are to be addressed as follows: <br />1. It is not anticipated that the proposed retaining wall will exceed four feet in height. If it <br />does, the Huthwaites acknowledge it will be necessary to comply with the requirements of the City's <br />ordinances regarding the design and construction of the retaining wall. <br />2 . The Huthwaites are in the process ofretaining a consultant to delineate and classify the <br />"unclassified wetland" referred to in the City Engineer's letter. We expect to have the wetland delineation <br />and classification completed, have the survey revised to show the boundaries of the wetlands and deliver <br />those documents to you by October 12. <br />3. As we discussed when I called you on Monday, the Huthwaites plan to keep the existing <br />buckthom hedge in place. This is an attractive, mature hedge providing screening that benefits both the <br />subject property and surrounding properties. It is important to the Huthwaites that the hedge not be <br />removed. The landscape architect has advised us that the type of buckthom in this hedge is a nursery stock <br />variety, not wild buckthom. The Huthwaites are obtaining a letter from the landscape architect describing <br />the hedge and the reasons it should not be removed. That letter will be delivered to you by October 12. <br />4 . The Huthwaites would like to construct the proposed foot bridge shown on the plans in <br />order to be able to access the southerly portion of the subject property, which is separated from the rest of <br />the property by Stubb's Bay Creek. They acknowledge that, if they do construct the proposed bridge, they <br />Huthwaite/C urtisLtr3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.