My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bay Ridge Road
>
1513 Bay Ridge Road - 10-117-23-34-0008
>
Land Use
>
11-3516, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 1:28:47 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 1:27:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 18, 2011 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Thiesse stated the hardcover requirements are primarily to protect the lake and that the water in this area <br />will not be going into the lake. Thiesse stated he would understand if they had to come back for a <br />hardcover variance . <br />Feuss stated that ultimately is their choice. <br />NG COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />6. RE ORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING <br />CO CIL MEETINGS ON JUNE 27, 2011, AND JULY 11, 2011 <br />Feuss noted she a ded the June 27th City Council meeting and all items were placed <br />Agenda. <br />Levang stated she attende the July 11 111 meeting and reported that the Whipple plication that was <br />approved by the Planning C ission variance was not approved by the Ci Council. The Whipple <br />property is located on Casco P · t Road . <br />Curtis displayed the proposed garag <br />difficulty to ask for a garage of that size . <br />beyond that. <br />Curtis stated the conversation of the Planni <br />uld be used for and that the Planning <br />ntered more around the level of hardcover. <br />Levang stated the garage would be use o store antique cars an s such would be a luxury. The City <br />Council did not feel the hardcover w reduced enough. The City ouncil also talked about a deck <br />located out front but was not disc ed in great detail. <br />Curtis noted the deck was on <br />Levang stated she would e to use this as a learning tool in the future so the <br />overrule the Planning mmission on other similar applications. Levang noted t <br />eventually tabled. <br />Curtis stated tha pplicant has submitted a revised plan today requesting 30 percent har <br />was a signific tin the driveway and a slight reduction in the size of the garage. <br />As it rela to the issues with the 0-75 foot zone and the nonconforming structure, Council Me er Rahn <br />had ser d on the Planning Commission before the statutes were changed. If the City requires the <br />rem al of a nonconforming structure , the City would be required to compensate the property owner. <br />-------------Page <br />12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.