Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 15, 1991 (49)ZONING FILE J1638-CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED additional cuestion. '•parse asked if the City 'dill In _fact remove this structure if a City facility is constructed else.dnere. 'Mabusth stated :hat the City def:n1te'_, will remove the structure aid th-t it will serve as a storage facility for sand and salt. Bellows amended her motion to s _ate acidities illy that the structure is temporary. Cohen second?d the amen-...-nt. All voted aye. :M.)tion carried. (#10)ZONING FILE ;1618-WILLIAM PUCEL BALDUR PARK PRD/SUBDIVISION-SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Mr. Pucel asked Mabusth if she would review his sketch plan again `.or the benefit of the Planning Commission members not present at the Mar,7h 18, or Marsh 20 Planning Commission :meeting. Mabusth displayed M.-. Pucel's sketch plan and brieflyexplained his proposal. She also showed the Planning Commission the three -lot subdivision proposed for this property by Marco Franklin. Mabusth noted that Mr. Franklin's proposal did not include any encroachment of the 73 foot setback area, that it did not require any setback Variances, and nad smaller house pads. The gradinc- plan did n•.)t include any grading within the 0-75' setback ate.. The issues involved with hardcover and the road would have needed to be addressed. Coher. said, "In my opinion, this prooer_y will not suop,.=rt three units, it will support one house. Mr. Puce! a.�kad what other issues the P'_anninc Commission would like him to address other than the road. He stated that he did not feel he had received sufficient direction from the Planninq Commission on what he could do to develop this property. Johnson question3d whether Mr. Pucel was planning the same stormwater treatment and grading plans as those s-.ibmitted b; Marci Franklin. 'ie stated that evan thoui ,ih this .3 a sketch Plan, Mr. Puce = provided enough information to enable hi^+ to determine er issues that need to be addressed. Johnson did a3ree tha 'RD is the way this parcel needs to b-a developed, but not state whether or not he would approve any Variances. Mr. Puce_ raj. u, "Th.? road would sixteen feet and the-e would be a draina3t area that would f.-w int-) a holding pond. There would not be any grading as we woe j build on site without havin3 a change in the topograph,_• The sewer would have to be installed along the s-)uth side. Before I invest more expense into this, I want to be sure I am going in the right direction. Bellows stated that sie would not bye in favor of recommending approval (j•: Variances to Great a PID on this site. - 13 -