My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1340 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0015
>
Land Use
>
91-1618, SKPLAN
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 12:52:37 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 12:50:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• EXHIBIT --A <br />TOt Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoni,.g Admini)trator <br />FROM, Alan P. Olson, City Planner <br />DATES April 13, 1982 <br />SUBJEM 1669 Tonka Lake Properties - Proposed Subdivision <br />(PRD) <br />The basic zoning on this property is U.-IC S acre/unit. <br />Because of the peninsula location and rueultant 3-aided 75' <br />setback requirements, this site is a nat.-al one to consider <br />for PRD cluster -type development allowing for defined housing <br />pads and common open space close ro the %-ke. <br />The limiting site factor is the la<e and -- iltant floodplain <br />area below elevation 931.5. This defines ,jth setback and <br />hardcover limitations. <br />All building sites including the existing house are above the <br />931.5 floodplain elevation. Provided an open space/flowage <br />easement over Outlot B is granted to the City, Section 31.841 c <br />allows this flood fringe area (between 929.4 and 931.5) to be <br />ereditid for density purposes. <br />All now building sites meet the 75' shoreline setback. The <br />existing house (aiad proposed lot) encroaches to about 40' from <br />the shore. It has been demonstrated to staff that 4 lots <br />totally conforming to the 75' setback are possible if the existing <br />house were demolished (lot 2 becomes smaller). The request is <br />to allow the existing structure to remain where it is. <br />The city could require removal of the existing house and full <br />compliance with the 75' setback as a PRD condition. However <br />since 4 conforming lots are feasible, the existing substandard <br />house location really has no bearing on determination of the <br />appropriate density. <br />Therefore, based on setback and net lot area factors, the <br />allowable density would be 4 or 5 units (2.75 acres - road <br />O.L.A. .22 acre - 2.53 acre ; .5 - 5 units by area or 4 units <br />practically possible per plan). <br />On the other hand, hardcover is extremely limiting. Per 31.931 <br />and 34.202, there can be no hardcover below elevation 931.5, <br />or within 75' of the shoreline. And in the remaining area <br />the maximum hardcover can be ;.o more than 253. The maximum <br />hardcover allowed is therefore only 5526 sf. Any amount over <br />th.s amount requires a varianco. <br />based upon the house sizes proposed (excluding drivewy <br />hardcover) the maximum density allowed by hardcover limitation <br />would be 2 units, not 4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.