Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Plannin,) Comrnistr,n IW-1 : Th_mas J. JacoLs, BU1lUlny nfficial DATE: March 10, 1982 SUBJLCT. 46b9 Tonka Lake Pruperties, 1340 baldur Park Road - PRD Subdivision - Work Session t.ist of Exnibits Exhibit A - Title Opinion - notinq tee ownership Exhibit B - Certificate of Title Exhibit C - Cuok letter (2-4-82) Exhibit D - Olson letter (9-17-80) Exhibit E - Council minutes (9-15-80) Exhibit F - Applicant's Attorney's letter Exhibit G - flan - doted February 24, 1982 The applicant proposes a 4 unit PRD of the total 2.75 acres at the tip of Baldur Park - does this sound tamiliar - this is their third try folks! I have attempted to clear up the questions raised by the Planning Commission of the wetland ordinance in the section immediately below the introductory comments. Once again, star .s beginning to sound like a broken record >ut this property is a,, right for a PRD development. Our major concern will still be the increase in hardcover resulting from any new development. Planning Commission should try to come to a compromise position on either controls over density level or limit of hardcover within each building envelope. The aniy reason 4 units can be propored by the developer is the location of the existing structures in relation to the allowed building envelope. Four units required to meet all setback could never be located within the allowed buildinq envel pe. Plann►nq Ccmjni!csion should ask for a reduction to 3 units based on the existinq riun conforming tes►dentlal structure located outsiJe of :he allowed Luildtnq envelope and on the hardcover inc-eases :esulting from 4 unit level of development. Nppllcant may be given option to remove existing house and pre.ient a plan showing all 4 units within the building envelope. (See hardcover section below) In Conaiderdtion ut ordinance 31.841 - specif►caily (L� & (c) At oi-i last met t.r.j, ,Planninq Commission interpreted section (b) ar not allow►nq any uvvvlopraert within the City of lands involveu with tio%>J plains or wetlands to ever yo below 5 acre of dry t.utld.iWt per unit. Staft has been advised that this section duty i.ut dpl.ly to 1'14D' ., suWkvisionw, etc seeking such credits. :..ttun (Ll i• a tuu; tar staff to Uetermininq the buildability r a I.ral•erty invulv••d with pritected area. The density review bt .uw ► 4 La .w-1 un tr. •: jnJorJs set forth in ur.' • nance 31 .0-i l c ) .