Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15, 1989 ZONING FILE #1326-WAYZATA COUNTF1 CLUB CONTINUED the ground water issue and poten.:ial storm sewer for Chevy Chase Drive be mentioned as a separate issue to be considered at a later date? Hanson indicated that tie did not. want to include that in his motion. Motion, Ayes=2, Nays=4. Motion failed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Cohen, *o table application #1326, pending negotiation between the appl_cant and Mr. Hauser. Planning Commissioner Hanson states: i.-hat tabling this �.pplication was totally inappropriate in the sense that it constrains the property owner. Brown asked whether there was any way to keep the application moving forward, 1,ut allow Mr. Lauer the opportunity to negotiate with Mr. Hauser? Hanson said that was the intent of his motion and added that tabling the matter "put Mr. Hauser in the driver seat". Gaffrcn suggested that the Planning Commission make a recommendation for denial which would allow Mr. Lauer to proceed to Cc;uncil. Chairman Kelley withdrew his motion. Mr. Lauer asked whether the requirements of addressing the drainage problem would still exist if tie agreed to Mr. Hauser's proposal? Kelley replied that runoff from his lot could not be increased. Mr. Greig asked whether the failed motion included extending the berm into the Golf Course? Kelley replied that the motion, included the City Engineer's recommendations. No further motions were forthcoming. f." BRING 8:52 P.M. TO 8:57 P.M. r. Sadler was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Planning Commission that Mr. Sadler was proposing to build a retaining wall along the east side of his property. The retaining wall would be located 40' from the shoreline. The City Engineer requested that the wall be cut. back. Chairman Kelley opined that Mr. Sadler's proposal was in excess of what was necessary. Planning Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Sadler why he preferred to build the wall longer than the City Engineer recommended? Mr. Sadler explained that his proposal would provide more flat surface for his yard and would better direct water away from his neighbor's property. Gaffron said that the City Engineer's proposal minimized the amount of fill in the 0-75' zone and would be less precedent -setting. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public heari,,g was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of this applicatio,l based upon the City Engineer's recommendations. The hardship for 10