Laserfiche WebLink
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />Planning Cfjminission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Frost: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: April 13, 1989 <br />Subject: #1391 Terry Sadler, 1.396 Aaldur Park Read - <br />Conditional Use Permit - public Hearinq <br />Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family, unaewt.rtd <br />Application - Request for variance and conditional use permit to construct <br />retaining walls in 0-75' lakeshore setback. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit. A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List. <br />Exhibit D - Appi:,ant's Letter of Request <br />Exhibit E - Survey <br />Exhibit F - Side View (note scales) and Staff Sketch (note: scale) <br />Exhibit G - Construction Diagram <br />Exhibit H - Hardcover Calculation by Applicant <br />w Exhibit I - Documentation From 1981 i 1984 Drainage Discussions <br />to J - NOT CI �G'�Ot,.1 f l4-r'�If''L 1"7 Nw1r,.+ IJ <br />4tinont <br />Code Sections - <br />Section 10.55, Subdivisions 8 i 10 (a portion of this retainii.q <br />wall <br />is in the area below elevation 931.5, within the *flood fringe") <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 (hardcover in 0-75' zone) <br />Pertinent Facts - <br />1. Applicant proposes to construct a retaining wall ranging from <br />6" to <br />60" in height along his easterly lot line. The wall is intended <br />to be <br />approximately 95, in length. The portion of wall exceeding <br />2' in <br />height- wi 11 be approximately 25' in length. The. wal 1 will be <br />just <br />inside the lot line. <br />2. The applicant's house was cfonstructed in 1984 after being granted lot <br />area and width variances. One of the concerns with that application <br />was giving attention to drainage and grading on the east side of the <br />property to protect the neighboi. inq residence. When ap;1 scant built <br />the house, it was apparently suggested by staff that a retaining wall <br />night be appropriate since the main portion of the house drainage was <br />naturally directed towards the neighbors deck area. The solution <br />reached at that time was a shale about 10' in froe the lot line at the <br />crest of the slope, keeping most of the run-off on applicant's <br />preporty but posing problems for sowing and maintenance of the lawn <br />due to the steep bank. <br />