Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT�B OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HRLD ON JANUARY 14, 1980 <br />PAGE 3 <br />4. Structure never to be used as a dwelling unit. <br />5. If approved, structure must comply with the <br />State and Uniform Building Code. <br />Motion seconded by Adams. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Veilleux and Mr. and Mrs. John Larson, <br />previous owners, were present. Mabusth reviewed <br />the renewal lot width and area variance application. <br />The Zoning Administrator noted the site plan as <br />presented required no setback variances. Jobbour <br />was concerned that the lot was involved in 75' <br />lakeshore setbacks at both the north and south side■ <br />of the lot. The Zoning Administrator advised that <br />E.B. HENDRICKSON <br />525 North Ferndale <br />VARIANCE <br />(6534) Continued <br />WIOBERT VXILLEUX <br />1396 Baldur Park Rd. <br />VARIANCE <br />(0536) <br />based on the depth of the lot and size of the proposed <br />house this would not apply. <br />The applicant was asked to comment on a house elevation <br />plan that revealed a dec!. on the lakeshore side. The <br />applicant was advised that the deck must meet the 75' <br />lakeshore setback and that the deck be spaced as he is <br />close to the maximum hardcover allowance for the lot. <br />Jahbour questioned the extent of the excavation to <br />accommodate the construction of the garage at that <br />location. He asked the applicant if it would be more <br />feasible to move the garage closer to the street side <br />and make use of the level area for driveway and garage <br />use. The applicant stated that he would consider <br />moving the entire house closer to the street and did <br />not see any problems in consideration of the unique <br />topography. <br />Hannah moved to recommend approval of the variance <br />request in accordance with site plan submitted <br />(Exhibit 3) with the condit.on that the house be <br />moved to accommodate proposed deck, noting all future <br />construction must not encroach lakeshore setback area <br />and consWeration be given in location of driveway and <br />garage in limiting unnecessary hardcover. Hannah <br />stated the following hardships and findings: 1) no <br />additional land available; 2) neighbors do not object; <br />3) similar application previously granted, and <br />4) surrounding neighboring lots are all of the same <br />size. <br />Motion seconded by McDonald. Vote: Ayes (7), Nays (0). <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />