Laserfiche WebLink
NINUTUS OP A ASGULAN, METING NEED .,ARCH 20, 1972 <br />Pe ge 2 <br />Ryerse moved, Southworth seconded, that <br />since tt:e lot has been in single r.eparate <br />ownership prior to 1961 and is s .-viced <br />by sewer, that approval be recow1,nded. <br />,lotion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />►1r. Berto��nnoli represented himself in a lot <br />site and Frontage variance of Lots 2-3, <br />!Block 15, Saga Hill, 1415 Park Drive. <br />Members studied the map for density in tits <br />area. There were three houses consisttnr <br />of one lot eacli in Block 15, one house <br />with two lots, Lots 2 A 3 are the subject <br />lots and Lots 6 A 7 are also vacant. It <br />was discb vexed that approval was given <br />by the Village Council in 1965 to build <br />on Lots 6 4 7 if they were combined and <br />also Lots 2 R 3, 1f combined. To date, <br />this combination has not been made. The <br />area is serviced by sewer and would have <br />1301 frontage and 31,000 sq. ft. of the <br />necessary 1401 and 43,S60 sq. ft. <br />Kul irg moved, Ryerse seconded, that <br />they recommend t1tat the original Village <br />Council decision of 1965 stand. lotion, <br />Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />ilemuers unanimously agreed to table the <br />William ►loar matter of service station <br />construction on Wayzata boulevard until <br />such time a conditional use permit is <br />applied for. <br />ilerfurth renorted that tie lind attended t,%e <br />National Nome Juilders Convention in San <br />Francisco and had a great opportunity to <br />converse with knowledgeable people on PUD <br />ordinances and also to view some sites in <br />Kansas City and Splt Lake City. Since there <br />were so many variables in PUD ordinances, he <br />was of toe opinion that tits committee rough <br />up a PUD ordinance and let the Planning <br />Commission give opinions as to the desirability. <br />lit posed a number of questions: <br />1. Does the Village wish to allow any increase <br />in density for amenities such an ordinance <br />would give? <br />2. Would PUD projects Dave to be toned in by <br />areas o. obtained by special use permits in <br />any sewered area of tae Village? <br />3. To what extent would the PUU ordinance allow <br />the developer to intermingle commercial, <br />industrial and iesidential usaRr.? <br />VARIANCE <br />1396 1laldur <br />( in •d <br />VARIANCE <br />Park Road <br />3.6 <br />Lot Site and Prontage <br />1415 Park Drive <br />BIFILDING PBRJIT <br />,Vi l l iam !Near <br />2120 Waytata Joulevard <br />P(1D ORDINANCE <br />