Laserfiche WebLink
VILLA ;E OF ORONO <br />Regular fleeting; of the planning* Commission, 7:30 P.'1. <br />'larch 20, 1972 <br />T;ie Planning Commission met on the above date <br />with tae follo►,ing members present: Chair- <br />man Soutaworth pro tem, Elliott, Kiillberp, ,r <br />Nicholls, Ryerse, and '.'jn ,Jest. lierfurtij <br />late. Also ,)resent: Councilman lassengale <br />anu Administra.cr iartin. Absent: Gzsch, <br />lays, Poisson, and Searles. <br />Jrs. Gary iiostetler represented herself in VARIANCE <br />an zpnlic;ation for a variance on lot size Lot Size F, Frontage <br />and frontage from t%e required o,i^ acre 1350 Rest Point Circle <br />and 140' lit widt:i. Brotigat out was tv-st <br />their lot is 53' on t:!e street, 09' on toe <br />lake, and 225' deep or roughly 14,600 sq. ft. <br />e oot-se on this lot burned out about two <br />w the ago and the ins-irance company <br />d; lared it a total loss, so they Irish to <br />co:struct a new home. Tney have a temporary <br />permit for 90 days to use a mobile ;come. <br />The existing rouse was hooked to sewer. <br />Elliott moved, Ryerse se_on 1e-i, clue to <br />hardshin and that the house was in single <br />separate ownership since 196 , annroval <br />be recommended. 'lotion, Aye? (6) - Nays ('0). <br />. embers reviewed tae ap lication of Joaui VARIANCE <br />Larson, 1396 Baldur Par Road, legally Lot Size F, Frontage <br />des..•ibPd as Lot 16, Block 1, Baldur Par,.. 1396 Baldur Park Road <br />Toe lot 'ias been in single separate owner- <br />s;iip for many years. T.iere was a summer <br />,souse on the prenises that he removed last <br />jecember at the insistence of tae Building <br />Inspector. The density study showed teat <br />with the exception of three parcels, w:iicn <br />consisted of two lots and one large parcel <br />at tine end of the point, the residences <br />in Baldur Park consisted of oie lot corre- <br />sponding to the subject lot in size and width. <br />Discussion was not ;field on what length of <br />time a variance was good for and w;iether <br />a ( nditional use permit could be issued <br />in lieu of a variance. It was brought out <br />that a residence was a permitted use and <br />as such, could not be conditioned. it was <br />noted that the next item on the agenda was <br />a variance on lot size and widt;i granted in <br />19bS. Some people bought the property an' <br />were old to apply for a variance so they <br />could be issued a building permit. <br />(Cont►nned) <br />