Project Plans - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINIJPF9 OF A PIANNING COMMISSION W,WING HETZ 'J)VFY74 R 7, 1977 - FAGS 7 The projected location for disposal of the spoils was the ►,ain concern of the Commission. Orono has ndopted a policy to deny previous applications for disposal of spoils within 1,000 ft. of the shoreline. After a lengthy discussion, Hassel moved, Hannah seconded, to table this application with the request that a detailed soils map and detailed plan for dredging be submitted with the under- standing that the dredging and spoils deposit will not violate Ordinance J125, and with the understanding that the Kid -cat dredging method will operate from the environmental standpoint as represented. The Planning Commission gives coaceptrialapproval to going forward Arid getting this date with the understanding that approval of the projected spoils disposal site would be determined After careful review of all reports documenting advantages frr)m project and essurance that project vr)uM not adversely effect the quality of the water. Proposed disposal site should be marked. Motion - Ayes (4), Nays (1) - Hurr, Abstain (1) •• McDonald. Mr. Butterfield was present. He is requesting an addition WREN BUrP-J* IEI.D to the existing structure. The addition to the south er►d of the 3925 14A.-ErRrOWN ROAD house would not interfere with the existing non-confo:-ning F'AONT do SIDE SETBACK FOR side ;,card setback to the north. The Zoning Administrator HOUSE ADDITION TO EXISTIN advised that staff had issued a permit for the family and 'VUN-COr*OkMING UJCATION recreation room portion subject to approval of the foyer. The #326 survey submitted was somewhat •.ague. The Planning Cormission interpreted the survey to indicate the existing front yard setback to be 24 ft. A variance of 81 i't. wouid be required. After some review, Helsel moved, Harwwrel seconded, to recommend approval of the 18 ft. side yard and 81 ft. front setback variance per Ilan submitted. lotion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). Mr. Mblde was Iresent. He is req',iesting approval to construct --RAYX)N'D "MDR" ID;DZ a second story on ais existing residence which is currently 1428 BAI.DUR PARK ROAD non -conforming in lot area, Lake and side setbacks. The VARIA:2CE - LOT AREA & WI17f proposal, 'emu_ d not .increase the exist'ng hardcover. 7i.e 1,roposej AND 1AKESHORE 6 SIDE YARD j plan indicates a 20 ft. height limit. SLTBACK GN EXISTING 'iGN- CONFOH4I:rj :LT AND HOUSL Mr. Which informed the Planning Commission this application 0327 was submitted prior to the Action recently taken by Cruncil granting staff ar,prvval cf rituations of this nature. Tire Pl%n• -I Cu-am:rsion s-wZested the aij-11cant coirb'ne tare subject } .-:o +rty w'th his 1-rui-erty vcmfss t, a .t-eet. The apyIcant initcsted no ubjection to tn's. He �as advised that a lot combineLion wt,ul9 el ir. ir.ste nny 100 ; 1 ir,g on Vnis , roperty across t!re Rtreet. McarAli r _Lei, Ha.an•rel ReC, ,,o%J, to r„!')., meri a},,rrval of the vPriarn:*e as ibjrct to co •b:natinn of Tuts 6, 17 Ana ,p. tn'o one Iarcesl. 3�rstifit ation: no increase in hardcover. Motion - Ayes (6), *r,rys (0).