Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 19, 1982 Pace 1.0 McDonald noted that the Planning Commission hadn't decided which side of the road they preferred the proposed structure to be on. Rovegno felt that it should stay roucihl y the same with a two stall garage and the second story. Kelley suggested that the workshop be added onto the existing house. That way he could heat the workshop year round. Opheim stated that it wa= a strange iot with the lake and ti,at the total iss-c- is how much additional hardcover could they be approving. If the applicant proposed a "normal" sized garage that he wouldn't have any problem with it. Rovegno stated that if it was built on the house side it would be out of the 75' cetback area. lie suggested that it be put on the --ie of the house away from the 0-75' setback line. Opheim stated once again that if the applicant came up with a normal two -tall garage and put it, on the same side as the exi, garage, in replacement of that garage it would be L t Rovegno noted the erosion problem and suggested that the shoreline may need smoe rip rap. Goetten suggested that the garaqe should be on the same side of the street as the existing structure and suggested soil borings be done for determining if the soil could handle such a structure. Kelley felt the same side as the existing garage, two stall and two story. liammerel concurred with Kelle-Y. McDonald suggested a two stall narage on side of house (lot 8) and no second story. Rovegno stated that the other side of the street would be fine as long as they directed the drainage away from the lake. Two story, reduce size, and don't increase the hardcover. Opheim stated that the proposers structure should be on the side where current garage is. The structure should be two stalls and soil borings should be clone to determine whether the soil could withstand a two story gtrue:ture. Vote: Ayes (0), Nays (0). ROTH (CONT)