Laserfiche WebLink
. ' ' � <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> • ��� � CITY of ORONO <br /> � <br /> ,� � - -t.:.. � <br /> ti <br /> �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF.THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L�kESI1�g'� NO. � � � � <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District,where 1.0 acre is the minimum <br /> required lot area. The property consists of approximately.95 acres. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 17, 2003 <br /> and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 0. . <br /> � 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The existing residence was built in 1966,prior to city adoption of the current <br /> 1 acre zoning standards. <br /> B. The adjacent neighbors' view of the lake will not be negatively impacted by � � <br /> the second story addition. <br /> C: Lot coverage by structures will be 4,231 s.f., (10.1%), below the 15% <br /> • � • allowed by City ordinance. <br /> D. The proposed addition is in character with other properties along Tonkawa <br /> Road. <br /> E. � Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone will decrease by 515 s.f. Applicants <br /> shall remove 128 s.f.from the ground level(lakeside)patio,the shuffleboard <br /> deck and the brick pavers around the shuffleboard deck. <br /> F. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone will decrease by 1,162 s.f. Applicants <br /> shall remove 703 s.f. of gravel located by the driveway,25 s.f.from the circle <br /> portion of the driveway, the brick apron and deck. � <br /> G. The applicants have requested to add to the existing house rather than build a <br /> new structure on the property. The owner has stated the existing foundation <br /> will not be removed or altered as part of the remodeling plan. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it . <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> • the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />