Laserfiche WebLink
17 OCT 88 <br />TO: CITY OF ORONO <br />PO BOX 66 <br />CRYSTAL BAY. 1114 55323 <br />r—� � 2 r :J � I ►� � <br />OCT 1 81988 <br />�I <br />SUBJECT: SUDD I V I S I O14-LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT ZON I NU FILL IJI I . <br />JUHNSUM/EISS/TRAINOR PROPERTY 1-311'I3 <br />1675 CONCORDIA STREET <br />FROPI s DAVE E I S5 <br />_ I request that you approve Howard Johnson's proposed lot line <br />'~ rearrangement giving the Trainor property an additional 5 tt <br />_ whe►e the_hoUse encroaches on the Johnson property. 1 am <br />buying the property from Howard and he and firs. Trainor- are <br />-_ trying to- get the lot 1 ine changed to rectify a problem <br />caused many years ago. They agree on the proposed solution. <br />I thing. the planning commission, besides beinu rude and <br />-r.�farrogant. is recommending unwise action. In effect they want <br />to reward undesireable behavior. Someune who added on to <br />their house without regard to any setbacVs. in fart without <br />_ _ rrau�►'d to their lot line. is somNune the planninq commission <br />wants to give 11 f t of property. <br />Neither Mrs. Trainor nor I+ . Johnson want to aet into a lecgat <br />battle regardinq the vaalrre of the property rt1r. Johnson will <br />have to turn over to r•Irs. T►-ainor. The snlutior► they have <br />_ proposed is a definite improvem►tnt on the e;:istinq setback <br />violation and it ratifies both parties. <br />In~case you're wunderinq what m; intentions are, my wife and <br />I plan to build a home for uAlrEzelves and tear down the <br />-�_ ,existingvhotrse. Our hope is to keep the entire piece of <br />property for ourselves. If fin&nces we miuhl_ Asl t.c) <br />sell off a parcel or two. In any case, wN don't intend to <br />asl for any variances. we won_ ' t betryinq to put 8 townhOLISes <br />on the lake or anythinq like that. We intend to improve <br />-_ property values in the neighborhood with w-ha f ever we da. We <br />_ __ __are as concerned as you about the proper use of land in <br />Orono. We are supportive of the set bacr a.id lot size <br />~_ rOgU i. rernen is . However. we t h 1 r, r the p 1 ann inq commis-41 on 3 s <br />being unreaaunablo and unwise H,4 to the SUblect proper-t;, <br />_ line proposal. the proposal is a reason-4ble solution to r <br />problem the cit;• failed to control in the past. <br />TThank you for your time and contaldera t] on. and thank 1or.i rur <br />puttinc., in your time to protect and improve our city. <br />Sincerel <br />lia•.e C �>s <br />